Going by last season, it wouldn't be a bad start if every one of the players in OUR team knew that!It's a very predictable system to play against though. You know exactly where each and every player is.
Going by last season, it wouldn't be a bad start if every one of the players in OUR team knew that!It's a very predictable system to play against though. You know exactly where each and every player is.
Almost every team that gets promoted in this division uses a 2 up front formation. If we can create an effective striking partnership, such as Baldock and Hemed, then they will score far more than if we were to play Hemed on his own with Baldock on the wing again, for example. They will bring the best out of each other, and this has been shown by Watford (Deeney & Ighalo), Bournemouth (Wilson & Kermorgant), Leicester (Nugent & Vardy), Burnley (Vokes & Ings) and many more successful championship sides over the last few years. I think it's quite exciting to see how we've set up over the last few friendlies.
This is what this thread needed. A considered, researched reply which clearly demonstrates why 442 works at this level. I recall that Pearson often went 343 when chasing games, an easy conversion from 442.
Having Stephens, Ince, Kayal and Crofts fighting for two places will mean that they have to keep their standards up to stay in the team. I see it as a positive.But surely it depends on the players you have. Currently our strongest position is central midfield, why limit that to 2 at a time?
But surely it depends on the players you have. Currently our strongest position is central midfield, why limit that to 2 at a time?
But why needlessly pack the midfield just because you have loads of central midfielders in your squad? That doesn't make sense
The football under Gus and Oscar was arguably the best football we have ever played. So don't give that.
Going by last season, it wouldn't be a bad start if every one of the players in OUR team knew that!
I want a formation that would allow Ince, Stephens and Kayal all through the middle. Those 3 could OWN games between them.
Having Stephens, Ince, Kayal and Crofts fighting for two places will mean that they have to keep their standards up to stay in the team. I see it as a positive.
No, hence i said arguably. From what I have seen that period and the last (not last season though) handful of years are the top two though.
When Hughton joined, he said that his preferred formation was 4-4-1-1. Occasionally, 4-2-3-1.
Given that he seems to have had carte blanche this summer to mould the club the way he wants, I expect him to set the team up in those formations, more often that not.
The Poyet years were very exciting.
For me watching the football at Withdean 2000-01 and 20001-02 were far more exciting than watching the Albion when Oscar was the manager.
I think Oscar was a fabulous manager.
When you think of the team he had to work with (arguably our worst ever year for injuries).
The fact that he got us to the play offs (I'll admit a bit last minute) speaks volumes for his management skills.
I for one wish he had stuck around. We would certainly not have had the disaster that was Sami Hyypia.
People say the football was boring, but he just had to make do with what he had.
I will not hear a word said against him.
Rant over carry on as you were.
Well said, huge shame for the club that the powers that be were not willing or unable to meet his requests.
always best to fit the system to the players currently without wide
attacking players both 442 and 433 are looking short of a couple
of quality options.
We do have 2 new athletic full backs and Hughton did try with a
degree of promise 352 for one game last year.We made need just 1 more
mobile centre back and Ince may be able to challenge for the back 3 and the
midfield 3.