Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
75 off of the first 8 or so without loss then bam, bam, bam.
83/3, Brook goes cheaply (0) again.
83/3, Brook goes cheaply (0) again.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Cricket] 1st ODI - India v England
- Thread starter Is it PotG?
- Start date
thedonkeycentrehalf
Moved back to wear the gloves (again)
- Jul 7, 2003
- 9,545
Sorry - my fault. Missed this game had started and as soon as I started watching we shipped three quick wickets.
I will turn off now so hopefully the runs will start flowing again
I will turn off now so hopefully the runs will start flowing again
I’m guessing you switched on again just as England reached Nelson ?
We started so well. Then Salt left stranded by little legs Duckett. Great catch to get rid of Duckett. Brook caught behind for a duck. Root lbw to Jadeja.
Buttler looks good. Bethell looks wobbly.
Buttler looks good. Bethell looks wobbly.
keaton
Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
- Nov 18, 2004
- 10,026
I was just about to claim credit as I i stuck the commentary on to be greeted by the collapse. Will turn later apparently , hence us picking one spinner
thedonkeycentrehalf
Moved back to wear the gloves (again)
- Jul 7, 2003
- 9,545
Yes! A meeting finished earlier than expected so I dipped back in to see how we were doing.
I have switched off again as into a run of meetings for the rest of the morning
fly high
Well-known member
Good 21 from Joffra but some of our batters need to have a look at themselves.
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
- Thread starter
- #8
Positivity and optimism on BBC website
’I reckon England have a good chance here. Assuming we can get an early wicket and that India play blindfolded and with plastic bats.’
’I reckon England have a good chance here. Assuming we can get an early wicket and that India play blindfolded and with plastic bats.’