- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,751
- Thread starter
- #21
A view, but not a proposed solution to where we find ourselves. Simple factual solutions, only please, no personal views
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
What do we do about Ireland/NI, Tariff Free deal and Fishing
- Thread starter WATFORD zero
- Start date
A view, but not a proposed solution to where we find ourselves. Simple factual solutions, only please, no personal views
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
A view, but not a proposed solution to where we find ourselves. Simple factual solutions, only please, no personal views
Have you contacted your MP yet
Regards
DF
daveinprague
New member
Have you contacted your MP yet
Regards
DF
Have you contacted any work agencies yet?
Sit down with the Irish & NI representatives and amend the GFA?
What about a trade/customs only crossings on the border?
nicko31
Well-known member
So border infrastructure? There are 300 crossing points
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
The GFA isn't a rigid agreement as some people think it is, oh well best of flogging the dead horse
Regards
DF
Mmmm, good point, maybe have designated trade crossings?
nicko31
Well-known member
If the border wasn't so politically sensitive and the UK agreed to adhere to EU standards a Swiss style solution could work, ie customs checks and freedom of movement.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,751
- Thread starter
- #30
But if the UK agreed to adhere to EU standards, I believe there would be various options for both Ireland/NI and the trade deal. (Fishing still O/S). Trouble is if it was simply standards, that wouldn't be sufficient for a Free Trade Deal. I believe it's the whole level playing field that would need to be agreed. (And that not adhering to EU rules was a major reason for Brexit).
You're right in that it's the political sensitivity of the border that's another of the issues.
Last edited:
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,751
- Thread starter
- #31
In the long run Ireland and NI re-uniting would resolve it as they would both be in the EU, but that would be a Looonnng game. Look how long and how much negotiation it took to stop the worst of the violence, which was something everyone wanted.
(Not particularly relevant, but the only time Ireland has been United in the last millennium was actually as part of Britain, so it's not really re-uniting
)
Last edited:
In the long run Ireland and NI re-uniting would resolve it as they would both be in the EU, but that would be a Looonnng game.
(Not particularly relevant, but the only time Ireland has been United in the last millennium was actually as part of Britain, so it's not really re-uniting
5 or six trade goods areas at various points on the border similar to the stations you see weighing lorry’s surely could work no?
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,751
- Thread starter
- #33
But you then have to deal with smuggling across the whole border outside of those crossings. Those crossings would need be major as they would need to process all procedures, standards, tariffs etc, same as all UK ports. Unless there was a free trade deal of course, but to get that the UK would have to agree to EU regulations, and the border wouldn't be needed.
Last edited:
Mmm tricky, I’ll give it some more thought, thank you for your considered answers.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,751
- Thread starter
- #35
Garry Nelson's teacher
Well-known member
Clearly no easy answers but in two words: we negotiate. This means trade-offs. Which means taking a hit on something to get something else. This is not easy to do when you paint yourself into a corner and raise unrealistic expectations. I'd be willing to take a hit on fisheries to preserve tariff free trade. I'd go for the border in the Irish Sea. I'd try and fudge the rest. The deal must give both sides something to 'take back'/save face. The problem with Johnson's position is that he's put himself into a position where he can't give anything without being torn to pieces by the loons in the ERG who he has cultivated.
This needs statecraft of a high level, not sloganeering and cheap populism. (Just look at this morning's reported gaffe about devolution being a 'disaster'.)
This needs statecraft of a high level, not sloganeering and cheap populism. (Just look at this morning's reported gaffe about devolution being a 'disaster'.)
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,751
- Thread starter
- #37
I agree that it's down to Trade offs. I'm not convinced the EU would accept a Free Trade deal with no level playing field in exchange for fishing rights. The free trade deal is worth Trillions of pounds over the next few years, compared to a fishing industry which has a smaller effect on GDP than Harrod's.
I agree that the Government will have to U-turn on the Border in the Irish Sea as the only other alternative I can see is Theresa May's backstop that she negotiated specifically to avoid the Irish Sea border.
Last edited:
nicko31
Well-known member
In the long run Ireland and NI re-uniting would resolve it as they would both be in the EU, but that would be a Looonnng game. Look how long and how much negotiation it took to stop the worst of the violence, which was something everyone wanted.
(Not particularly relevant, but the only time Ireland has been United in the last millennium was actually as part of Britain, so it's not really re-uniting
The Ulster Unionists only represent a few hundred thousand but they value the Union far more than your average English person and the average English person has very little understanding of NI. If there was a proper understanding Brexit would not have happened
I've spent some time in NI, I'm not sure if reunification would ever be accepted by this group. The EU SM was the foundation for peace in Ireland and made way for the historic GFA, it effectively created a UK/Ireland Schengen free travel area. This peace bonds our unity of nations
All very true but tbf the NI situation alone imho wouldn’t have been enough to stop people voting Brexit.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,751
- Thread starter
- #40