Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] The Coronavirus Good News thread



pearl

Well-known member
May 3, 2016
13,126
Behind My Eyes
With the schools closing children are being encouraged to be creative!!!! :clap2: :clap2: :clap2:

A young parent recently told me that her twins get ONE hour of Art per TERM :down:
 




RossyG

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2014
2,630
4F5FA8C6-5A47-4BDC-A628-B90366205DE1.jpeg

E47851BA-E901-4C94-BAA3-CA33AA46462F.jpeg
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,530
Burgess Hill
Just had a VC with one of my gang in Hong Kong...........things are starting to relax a bit, virtually all the (small number of) new cases are people coming in to HK from Europe........small steps but a bit of normality starting to return.
 


RossyG

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2014
2,630
Mixed news but hopefully a mere blip and definitely a noticeable improvement.

E69E99A6-7BF3-4173-9879-28BAE4541230.jpeg
 


bhafc99

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2003
7,455
Dubai
Dave Beasant's son (who, randomly enough, is my FX trader) just got me an incredible deal on my monthly AED to GBP transfer. Several hundred £ better than usual. Top man!
 












Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,339
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
With plenty of toilet roll luzzing.

Exactly!

In fact I think when the football does eventually return we need to round up the horders, nick their bogroll and have a good old fashioned bogroll "display" from the stands. Followed by luzzing the actual horders from the top of the WSU, obvs.
 








piersa

Well-known member
Apr 17, 2011
3,155
London
The mortality rate is far less than reported, because the mortality rate being reported appears to only be only based on those with confirmed virus. 80% of people have nearly no or mild symptoms and thus barely any of them will report to a medical professional.

This is a good thread. We need to be positive in order to get through this or you will end up driving yourself mad. Best advice is to turn off twitter and facebook. They are an abyss of nonsense.
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,284
Back in Sussex
A new epidemiological paper on Wuhan has been released. It's not considered "live" yet, as it's not been peer reviewed. However, if it passes this review and is accepted, the numbers are very promising, eg:

The total number of infections (i.e. cumulative infections) estimated at 1905526 (95%CrI: 1350283-2655936) in Wuhan City, raising the proportion of infected individuals to 19.1% (95%CrI: 13.5-26.6%). We also found that most recent crude infection fatality ratio (IFR) and time-delay adjusted IFR is estimated to be 0.04% (95% CrI: 0.03-0.06%) and 0.12% (95%CrI: 0.08-0.17%), which is several orders of magnitude smaller than the crude CFR estimated at 4.19%.​

In short, the death rate for this could potentially be far, far lower than previously estimated.

Source >>> https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.12.20022434v2

(However, that's still no grounds for complacency since it still has the potential to overwhelm health services with those who do require hospitalisation.)
 






hart's shirt

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2003
11,076
Kitbag in Dubai
Crystal Palace have confirmed that none of their players have tested positive for coronavirus.

It didn't come as a surprise to supporters as they're used to negative results.
 


vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
28,272
A new epidemiological paper on Wuhan has been released. It's not considered "live" yet, as it's not been peer reviewed. However, if it passes this review and is accepted, the numbers are very promising, eg:

The total number of infections (i.e. cumulative infections) estimated at 1905526 (95%CrI: 1350283-2655936) in Wuhan City, raising the proportion of infected individuals to 19.1% (95%CrI: 13.5-26.6%). We also found that most recent crude infection fatality ratio (IFR) and time-delay adjusted IFR is estimated to be 0.04% (95% CrI: 0.03-0.06%) and 0.12% (95%CrI: 0.08-0.17%), which is several orders of magnitude smaller than the crude CFR estimated at 4.19%.​

In short, the death rate for this could potentially be far, far lower than previously estimated.

Source >>> https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.12.20022434v2

(However, that's still no grounds for complacency since it still has the potential to overwhelm health services with those who do require hospitalisation.)

That does sound hopeful but we still need to be scrupulous about hygiene and contacts.
 




Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,468
Brighton
The mortality rate is far less than reported, because the mortality rate being reported appears to only be only based on those with confirmed virus. 80% of people have nearly no or mild symptoms and thus barely any of them will report to a medical professional.

This is a good thread. We need to be positive in order to get through this or you will end up driving yourself mad. Best advice is to turn off twitter and facebook. They are an abyss of nonsense.

Absolutely. I’m only going on the Gov updates and this thread, basically. The vast majority of twitter (or my Twitter feed, anyway...) and Facebook is really unhelpful.
 




Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,468
Brighton
A new epidemiological paper on Wuhan has been released. It's not considered "live" yet, as it's not been peer reviewed. However, if it passes this review and is accepted, the numbers are very promising, eg:

The total number of infections (i.e. cumulative infections) estimated at 1905526 (95%CrI: 1350283-2655936) in Wuhan City, raising the proportion of infected individuals to 19.1% (95%CrI: 13.5-26.6%). We also found that most recent crude infection fatality ratio (IFR) and time-delay adjusted IFR is estimated to be 0.04% (95% CrI: 0.03-0.06%) and 0.12% (95%CrI: 0.08-0.17%), which is several orders of magnitude smaller than the crude CFR estimated at 4.19%.​

In short, the death rate for this could potentially be far, far lower than previously estimated.

Source >>> https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.12.20022434v2

(However, that's still no grounds for complacency since it still has the potential to overwhelm health services with those who do require hospitalisation.)

Excellent.

Unfounded, I know, but I still suspect far, far, far more than 55,000 have it or have had it already in the UK. Does this paper potentially support that hypothesis?
 


Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,339
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
Absolutely. I’m only going on the Gov updates and this thread, basically. The vast majority of twitter (or my Twitter feed, anyway...) and Facebook is really unhelpful.

If the country gets locked down then Twitter and Facebook should be blocked (won't be possible of course, despite every other business taking a massive twatting). And, preferably, never brought back up.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here