You're the one who linked Trump to my statement.
I just stated Libertarianism is becoming an option for those sick of the right and the left. It's a re-emergence of the individual who is sick of authoritarians.
The awakening of Libertarianism is a beacon of hope.
When was that picture taken and where is Nigel's poppy?
This. No good bleating on about the far right (who I deplore) without recognising that all of the current needs we are in is due to the unparalleled leeway Blair and his ilk in Europe and the USA had when going to war, loosening banking culpability and ignoring the growing dissatisfaction from a large part of the electorate.You are wrong, we have seen the consequences of neo liberalism, it encapsulates the global banking crisis, illegal wars, the ascendency of global corporatism and a wide open door to global migration.
It is these matters collectively and/or individually that have bestowed power to these alt-right wing (to use your reference) politicians. Brexit and Trump are merely symptoms of this dynamic.
They may turn out to be worse, but we will truly need 15-20 years to judge.
You may dislike Farage and Trump but they have not got blood on their hands like Blair. For every moan you make about them, you should have 20 about Blair.
Perspective is everything dear boy.......
This. No good bleating on about the far right (who I deplore) without recognising that all of the current needs we are in is due to the unparalleled leeway Blair and his ilk in Europe and the USA had when going to war, loosening banking culpability and ignoring the growing dissatisfaction from a large part of the electorate.
When was that picture taken and where is Nigel's poppy?
Over the weekend Farage was enjoying himself with the global elite, it would normally be expected for a party political leader to be at the Cenotaph. In fact I expect those following the cult of Farage would crucify Corbyn if he had done similar but I expect Farage himself will get a free pass.
NATO is a name for an agreement and we live in a different world today. Once we understand that Russia is not an enemy we will realise that NATO isn’t really applicable. If anything Europe and Russia need closer ties and agreements in place because we have to protect our own continent. We could probably do with a Euro military and air force these days but do the US need to be a major part of it?
It is more important for Europe and Russia to see peace in the Middle East than it is for the US, because the US is half a world away. It is more important for Europe and Russia to align in strategy and with the US involved it makes it more complicated
If this is all about oil and energy I don’t care where I get it from or who gets rich from it because it makes no difference to my pocket. Our choice is lining the pockets of a rich Americans or lining the pockets of rich Russians so it really doesn’t matter who is providing or selling the resources? Maybe having a Russia with a better economy is better for Europe than fighting to keep it poor?
I certainly begrudge our money going to the Sunni states who only invest in Wahhabism, Islamic school of thought and the financing of extremist imams. Iran is more pragmatic in its approach to world politics than the Saudi’s and Shia Iran is not the same country as 10-40 years ago. Sunni Islam is impossible to work with and Shia Islam is less so.
If NATO is all about promoting Wahhabism, by design or default, and threatening Russia we need to take a seriously good look at ourselves and the purpose of NATO.
One English and one American?
Are you chastising me as well [MENTION=277]looney[/MENTION] , I've already been bollocked over calling L&H clowns
There's two things I think are absurd in here:
-- that Russia under Putin should be our friend: Russia is utterly corrupt, and Putin has halted any hope for it
-- that "NATO is all about promoting Wahhabism": really? that's all it's about?
Hilarious.
So instead of recognising the rhetoric of the alt-right for what it is, we should wait 15-20 years for them to utilise useful idiots such as Trump, Farage and other traditional conservatives in order for them to establish and pursue their agenda? No thanks.
The appropriation of left and centre-left movements by Blair et al was evident very early on. Instead of curtailing it, people allowed them to continue. I'd rather not go through that again.
Perspective is everything? Yeah it maybe. However I'd say learning from previous mistakes more appropriate when choosing leaders.
That is the subjective world view that has been sold to you. The west has built itself on corruption so we don't monopolise a moral high ground on the subject.
Indirectly the west has financed Sunni Wahhabism growth in this form of Islam. Mecca is built on oil not Allah and it exports a dangerous culture in the form of religion.
What the feck has Blair got to do with liberalism? !
That isn't true. There is corruption all around the world, the west has built itself on trading, industrialising, and capitalism.The west has built itself on corruption
But surely the Brexit and Trump elections prove that many people in the electorate have learnt from their mistakes?
The neo liberal political ideology of occupying the centre ground has been rejected, as have the promises of the same old centrist politicians saying they will make changes etc.
Trump and Brexit should be afforded the time to flourish, its on this basis that only time will tell if it has genuinely benefitted the US and UK respectively.
Only then can you say you were right.