OK if I move into your flat tomorrow , not a problem is it ?
I'm just saying it's a moral and philosophical dilemma, that is all.
OK if I move into your flat tomorrow , not a problem is it ?
I'm struggling to find a problem with people coming here to study and pumping their money into our economy. Could someone please enlighten me?
and this! Why does one person have more right to be somewhere than another. This also calls into question the very concept of owning a piece of land.
Most of the immigration we are talking about is from Europe.
As has been shown, most of the immigrants from Europe are in employment and paying UK taxes.
No doubt some are concerned about the cultural implications. Personally, I see the positives that immigration brings to our culture rather than the negatives.
As long as we continue to have an open door policy for immigrants, even if they come here to work, it will mean less jobs for British people. If we control immigration, then the lazy good-for-nothing Brits who don't work and don't plan to work could no longer use the excuse of no jobs being available. It would be a lot easier to force them to work because there would be plenty of jobs (including the menial ones like car washing now the exclusive terrain of Eastern Europeans) and we could refuse benefits when there was work available.
Personally I would rather that the British under-class was forced to work than have the jobs they should be doing filled by Eastern Europeans and others.
Personally, I'm not prepared to give up one of the largest free trade areas in the world (about to become bigger if the EU can do the deal they are talking about with the USA) just to force some British underclass out to get a job. The trade off is not worth it.
Benefits do cost us money and we do want Brits to get off their backsides and get a job, but not at the cost of British business.
Personally, I'm not prepared to give up one of the largest free trade areas in the world (about to become bigger if the EU can do the deal they are talking about with the USA) just to force some British underclass out to get a job. The trade off is not worth it.
Benefits do cost us money and we do want Brits to get off their backsides and get a job, but not at the cost of British business.
Or as Doug Stanhope would say...
Most of the immigration we are talking about is from Europe.
As has been shown, most of the immigrants from Europe are in employment and paying UK taxes.
No doubt some are concerned about the cultural implications. Personally, I see the positives that immigration brings to our culture rather than the negatives.
I prefer the idea that we find a culture that suits us. It seems rather unimaginative and arbitrary to simply follow a culture because you were born into it. Make choices, instead of having them forced upon you "if you're worried about the weather, then you have found the wrong place to live"
There are going to be less jobs for everyone anyway. The service sector has peaked and is going to plummet. If fewer employment opportunities is what concerns you the most about immigration, then don't let it - it's a problem that is going to exponentially become more severe over the coming years, despite immigration. We really need to prepare for a future with less jobs.
I have no issues with the culture side of immigration at all. My issue is that we as a country can't support the population growth as it currently stands - roughly 400k extra every year ( a 50/50 ish split between births and immigration ).
> We don't build enough homes for this increase
> We don't increase services such as doctors, school places, NHS resources etc to match this growth
> We don't generate enough jobs to cover this growth
We, as a nation, therefore have two stark choices :
1. Reduce the growth - only two real ways of doing that, control how many children are born ( not sure anyone would support that ) or control immigration.
2. Invest heavily in infrastructure but what do we do year on year while we ramp up ? We only built around 100k new homes last year - that is a small dent in the requirement to house an extra 440k people and doesn't take into account the increasing trend of people living by themselves.
So for me controlling immigration isn't a racist, cultural or bigoted thing to do, it's the pragmatic, sensible and practical part solution to population growth.
And I haven't even touched on digging up the green belt, supply of food and water problems and the ever increasing level of cars population growth brings !
Something I don't know about, but didn't we already have free trade before immigration came along.
Yes, we need an answer to housing and over-population, I agree. I'm not convinced that leaving the EU or throwing up the borders is the answer to that. I'm not saying that this is what you are advocating.
Most of the immigration we are talking about is from Europe.
As has been shown, most of the immigrants from Europe are in employment and paying UK taxes.
No doubt some are concerned about the cultural implications. Personally, I see the positives that immigration brings to our culture rather than the negatives.
I have no issues with the culture side of immigration at all. My issue is that we as a country can't support the population growth as it currently stands - roughly 400k extra every year ( a 50/50 ish split between births and immigration ).
> We don't build enough homes for this increase.
We don't want to build more homes ... the country is FULL.
I drove the M25 the other Saturday morning from Watford to Crawley. Crawling all the way ... it took me TWO FRICKING HOURS. And there were no accidents or road closures .... just volume of traffic ... ON A SATURDAY MORNING.
The country is FULL UP. No more room.
To people hoping to come here to live .... GO AWAY.
To those already here ... STOP HAVING SO MANY KIDS ... two per couple is more than adequate.
Actually thou that is changing. Lots of immigration from the EU includes immigration from outside the EU. If you can look a bit deeper in to that problem, you might see why people like Farage has the point about open borders. As it is the EU is being swamped with Asylum Seekers from outside the EU, look at the numbers turning up at Lampedusa and other entry points to the EU - http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/16/lampedusa-island-of-hope
Look at the numbers in Calais waiting to get here. You simply can't leave these people wondering around, eventually they will either have to give everyone a passport offering travel to any part of the EU or each country in the EU zone will have to take these people. Now that sounds fine, but the problem is once you start doing that there will be hundreds if not millions of people from outside the EU all hoping to do the same thing.
We don't want to build more homes ... the country is FULL.
I drove the M25 the other Saturday morning from Watford to Crawley. Crawling all the way ... it took me TWO FRICKING HOURS. And there were no accidents or road closures .... just volume of traffic ... ON A SATURDAY MORNING.
The country is FULL UP. No more room.
To people hoping to come here to live .... GO AWAY.
To those already here ... STOP HAVING SO MANY KIDS ... two per couple is more than adequate.
. Perhaps its more a case of the UK failing to find the right policies to enable housing development to take place?