SeagullRic
New member
Well who is the better player then? When we signed Thomson it was supposed to be as a replacement for Hammond, but he has subsequenbtly turned out to be absoloute toilet. I know who I'd rather see wearing the stripes!
Well who is the better player then? When we signed Thomson it was supposed to be as a replacement for Hammond, but he has subsequenbtly turned out to be absoloute toilet. I know who I'd rather see wearing the stripes!
I agree...........but it,s down to Dick Knights judgement who is the better player.
No it's not. It was Dick's decision to sell Hammond, but I doubt he recommended Thomson. That blame must lie with Barry Lloyd.
No player comes to this club without manager Dick Knights approval.
In terms of wages, correct. I didn't think that what he thought of the pkayer came into it. I always thought that he just trusted his manager.
Two seasons ago, Hammond. But Hammond lost his way and Thomson looks the better player from what I've seen.
Are you happy at your new home, St Dunstans...?
Thomson hasn't got anything like the physical prescence Hammond did.
huh?
But he makes up with experience. Think he's quite tactical too, which is why he's vice-captain.
How has Thomson been toilet? He's often the unsung hero, making tackles and keeping the ball - thats his job. I would still agree that Hammonds the better player though.
But he makes up with experience. Think he's quite tactical too, which is why he's vice-captain.
Whatever people say Hammond was a good player. Way better than anything we have in the centre.