Search results

I have heard some commentators suggesting we are being churlish booing someone because he was an ex player. No we are boing him because he behaved like a complete **** to force a transfer.

I am pretty disgusted with how opposition players were allowed to cut him down early in his career. The cynical way they dealt with his speed and agility and the lack of punishment from the refs have put a massive dampener on what could have been an absolutely stellar career. That being said he...

I suspect you are correct; I certainly hope so. Otherwise, it shows that the club's attitude toward supporters has taken a deep dive.

So I am guessing you don't have the courage to clarify the questions I put to you regarding this thinly veiled insult

Well he made himself a great opportunity in the few minutes he was on, so very positive.

As much as I soured toward him in the end I will give him at his height we were clinical in front of goal. Give the team time, most of them including Fab have yet to find anything like their full potential. While it is a bit worrying that we are struggling against weaker sides (Brentford don't...

100% this. Our form will turn around, and to be honest with all the talk of our present form, it is actually not that bad, not good admittedly but I don't see too much need for hand wringing

You need to add "No I am not but there certainly seems to be a growing number who are" to the poll. Some of the comments are getting absurd. FWIW if we consistently finish top half without having constant relegation scares and the occasional tilt at silverware with the hope, sometimes realised...

Bloody heck there must be a fault in the universe, not only do I agree with you I have even given you a thumbs up, scary and unpredictable times :D

Exactly, I look at some of the posts and I get the impression that some people are genuinely pissed that we are only in the top ten of UK teams rather than top 4. Get a grip. TB's outlook has always been slow, steady, and affordable. If that means we become a perennial top ten club, with only...

So let me get this straight A.You seem to be suggesting that the grotesque caricature that "woke" has become from what it originally seemed, is somehow going to sort out the issues that a section of Australian society seems to have regarding women. B. I could well be wrong here but the second...

as I said if I wrote that without the clarification of not guilty then I clearly made an unintentional error.

Err I kind of have, the post where I said this was directed at the person I quoted. Go back and read it again without skimming through. Here I'll help you, this is the line you have taken offense at " If I am reading you correctly you are saying because there are so many complaints he must be...

We were just talking about what effect all the coverage might have if there were a trial, there has been an accusation of some level of sexual assault

It's not about Wallace it's about the process and where we are heading. I am absolutely opposed to the concept of "believe the victim" for the reasons I have stated. I couldn't care if there were 17 or 1700 allegations. We need to listen to the complaints, and the target of the complaints and...

Sure no one has used the word must, but they have come as close as you can without saying it. Even criticising someone for having the audacity to suggest all the media talk could prevent a fair trial.

Wow arguing for the fundamental right of all people to a fair and unbiased trial is defending them!!! He is not campaigning, just pointing out how our legal system works and how it must work. This gives me an idea of just how far down the road of Guilty until judged innocent you have gone.

Really a one sided fair trial, how does that work. Surely to be fair it must be so for both parties. You see this is a major problem. If I am reading you correctly you are saying because there are so many complaints he must be guilty, and yes if you were to put a gun to my head and say decide...

No I don't, enough people have responded and asked questions in context. That a few of you are incapable of/or can't be bothered understanding my response in the context of what I am responding to is hardly my fault. It would appear instead that you flick through the paragraph, don't bother...

Which one? Was I correct? If I was wrong I apologise