The report covers COVID and cancer treatment and not any argument about who should be treated. I’m not either.
It identifies that will be a problem further down the line. This is just cancer and doesn’t include other life threatening conditions. Sadly another ticking time bomb.
Sent from my...
That is not up for debate and as far as I’m aware ever was? You implied that people prematurely dying of cancer due COVID was a greatly exaggerated story on Facebook. It clearly isn’t. How many of 36,000 with greatly reduced life spans will die in the next couple of years or is it that not...
So you don’t like women in authority ... why didn’t you say so.
Personally I think most pundits are shit and are picked because of who they are rather than what they know. Robbie a Savage being a prime example. The guys that do the football league matches are way better.
You must have had...
The lancet paper I quoted isn’t Facebook.
3000 will directly die due to lack of treatment, a further 36,000 will have a significant reduction in life expectancy. Both these figures are low end.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Below is an attract from a paper published in the Lancet last month on effects of COVID on cancer treatment.
Bottom line is that at least 3000 people will die because they didn’t receive treatment due to COVID precautions.
We estimated that across the four major tumour types, breast...
True but boris et al are pushing these two clowns for title of ****wits of the 21st century.
These two are consigned to history, unfortunately we’ve still got Boris and rest of the idiots. I’m trying to think of any redeeming futures of this government and have failed miserably.
Sent from my...
It’s called progress.
To quote the man of the 60’s (oh the irony)
Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is rapidly agin'
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your...
A virologist on radio 5 stated that whilst he couldn’t rule it out, he was of the opinion that we would not go back to the levels of deaths and hospital cases seen at the height of the pandemic.
I think his name was Chris Smith.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That is as about as damning a verdict as you can get. The man is clueless and not fit to manage the national side. TBH, I’m not sure he’s fit to manage at championship level ... which he proved at Middlesbrough ....
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
As an analogy ... that’s shocking.
Letting Murray go will not relegate us, he scored one (yes that’s one) premier league goal last season. He will be 37 this month. If you are implying that our fate rest on the shoulders of 37 year old striker then we are truly screwed. Yes we need a striker...
The fast majority realise that we need a striker but with a month left in the window we aren’t shitting our pants. You seem to running around shouting ‘fire’!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk