Count me in chaps!
GK L Camp
DF H Ilunga
DF J Tomkins
DF A Faye (C)
DF L Chambers
MD W Buckley
MD A Adomah
MD T Mkandawire
MD M Gradel
ST C Mackail-Smith
ST S Long
I'm shown as pending in the league - I'm The Peckham Massif Albion...
I may well frustrate you, but I'm sure it isn't as frustrating as it is to find you avoiding the questions - again. We invaded Iraq in 2003, 2 years before 7/7, against public opinion. How do you tally the government taking such a step - irrespective of public opinion - with your claim that the...
You may not have, but it has been mentioned in support of one conspiracy theory on this very thread. If you don't believe it - if there are two separate conspiracy theories about 7/7 - maybe the two of you should go and have your own debate about why the other's conspiracy theory is wrong. Maybe...
Or, of course, the other possibility that seems to be completely ignored - despite being the simplest explanation (Occam's Razor, the point that no conspiracy theorist is willing to acknowledge they self-contradict on) - is that the services didn't get involved.
One obvious explanation is that...
Apologies if I've missed it, but have you referred to the panorama programme in 2009 - the one that gave the Ripple Effect writers enough rope to hang themselves with, and showed how many holes there were in their own theory? Shame it's not still on iPlayer.
As if our Government (of any party)...
dingodan - Another question (if I may) that may seem a slight tangent - do you not believe that religious suicide bombers exist? Do you believe that 9/11, and every single suicide bomb in Iraq, Pakistan & Afghanistan (I can't even begin to remember the number there have been - hundreds) are all...
Of course, the other point is that those running this country can't even close a bloody window without leaving a dossier about it on a train, or having papers snapped by the paparazzi. The idea that a scheme this big, involving this many people, could go ahead without a single one of them...
A small question on the side - if you genuinely believe the state is killing it's own citizens, why are you not going f*cking mental about it, and trying to bring it down?
Brunswick - you appear to have missed the glaring contradiction on that video that appears before you even hit 'play'. Underneath the video, it states quite clearly that the conclusion is drawn on the basis of "Occam's Razor".
You (and the theory) then deviates directly away from Occam's Razor...
I don't normally (ever?) agree with what Peter Oborne has to write in the Telegraph, but this is from his article on the current shambles:
It's unlikely that the Telegraph is going to invent reasons to praise the Guardian, so I'm tempted to believe this is true.
Block E = Block F. Originally there wasn't going to be a block F, it was just going to go D E G H etc, now they've changed it so it goes C D F G H etc. They'll be the same seat :thumbsup:
Sorry mate, I completely agree with SeagullEd - but don't think he's backing the Nigels. I'm more than happy to banter and whatever with the Palace fans, and I'm convinced we'll finish far above them this year (I think they'll get relegated, but that's not the topic at hand).
The point is...
Neither would leave them in a particularly good light really. Would have been bloody messy if there weren't enough left to honour the 1,250pt promise. As it is, I think they closed the loophole in time that they can honour it without having to take back any 1,000pt tickets - so I suspect they'll...