Search results

Except that it appears that Parish was initially very enthusiatic (Palace's own statement says this) and it was only when the plan was leaked and the people who were going to be turfed out of their seats objected that the plan was shelved. So effectively Parish is bravely standing up to himself...

350 up, 4th batting point gained.

Really? So why is there a link to Palace Ladies on the CPFC website? Seems to be some sort of connection...

I wonder if Kent's Harry Podmore is related to Dave Podmore?

Kent 137 All Out

Yes, please do go on. How much will that reduce your revenue:wage ratio? Actually, let me help you. If we take the top end of your prediction and apply it to the last set of accounts - 16/17 - then instead of spending 78% of your turnover on wages the figure would have been 73% which would...

Just reading through this thread and this is really the most ludicrous thing that has been written so far. Try doing some basic maths and tell me how far increasing the capacity to 35,000 will change your revenue:wage ratio. Please show your working.

Really? CPFC 2010 Ltd is a wholly owned subsiduary of Palace Midco UK Ltd which in turn is a wholly owned subsiduary of Palace Holdco UK Ltd. 67.5% of the shares in Palace Holdco UK are owned by Palace Holdco LP, a company registered in Delaware. Steve Parish owns 17.81% of the remaining...

Dealt very well with the "why has Knocky become shit?" question.

Try this - https://flubit.com/shop/p/FLQ495WZM not bought from them so no idea of quality etc.

Yleem Poblete??!! what sort of name is that? They're not even trying...I call FAKE NEWS.

You want a thread (wrongly) complaining about a thread being deleted to be deleted? Surely we will then just get Eagle88 starting a "Where's My Zaha Thread Gone" thread. :jester::lolol:

And a helmet will make things worse in some situations. The benefits are so marginal that compulsory helmet wearing is, to me, a severe over-reaction. I wear a helmet, my children wear helmets but I don't want to force everyone else to wear a helmet. No-one is suggesting binning headgear...

Wearing a seatbelt has clear safety benefits - the evidence for helmet wearing is genuinely less clear cut (although it is probably best to wear a helmet). There is clear evidence that compulsory helmet wearing can have an adverse effect on health at a population level - not the case for...

The main point is that compulsory helmet wearing has been shown to reduce the rate of cycling and that this has an adverse effect on the health of the population as a whole. I didn't realise that I had to provide citations...The study on cars riding further away from cyclists was written by Ian...

This is a very contentious issue and is not as simple as it first seems. 70-80% of cyclist fatalities involve serious head injuries so it would seem fairly obvious that compulsory helmets would save lives. However... There is evidence that at a population level compulsory cycling helmets...

Nope, you're the one who has completely missed the point. But never mind, you're obviously a bit hard of thinking.

Any reason why the reply seems to have been sent before the question?

Possibly bad news for those with tattoos. https://www.itv.com/news/2018-08-08/tattoo-ink-health-risk-fears-could-lead-to-eu-restrictions/

Moron. What do you think Andone's supposed to do, not to mention Jahanbacksh? :ffsparr: