Matthew was an eye-witness to Jesus's life and Mark wasn't. And the suggestion is that the best that Matthew could do for his gospel was to copy most of Mark's rather than write about what he had seen himself. Doesn't make sense.
Please provide evidence of these claims, how do you "know"?
About the only thing we know for sure is that half of the books claimed to be written by Paul are forgeries.
No-one thinks that Matthew wrote the gospel of Matthew - that was a random suggestion by church fathers hundreds of years...
As I mentioned earlier - if the creation story is fictional, Adam is fictional, and (according to Luke) Jesus can trace is lineage to Adam, so Jesus is also fictional.
It’s all a bit of a mystery.
The Sanhedrin (who unanimously voted for Jesus to be put to death Mark 14:55), were responsible for providing tombs for criminals who were crucified. Paul confirms this in Acts 13:29. Joseph of Arimathea (the nice guy who provided a grave for Jesus) was a member of...
Outside of the bible, there is more evidence that Joseph Smith met the Angel Moroni than there is evidence of the crucifixion. And the evidence for Moroni is contemporary from people who were there, not people writing many decades later from heresay.
So, are you a Mormon?
If you had read the bible you would know that no one has gone to heaven. The dead are all rotting in their graves - until Jesus returns, which he hasn’t done. So what Triggaaar said is 100% correct, and your response is dumb.
Stop telling me what I think and pretending that I support your beliefs. You don’t know what I think, and your yes/no poll is an insult to people who do serious historical research.
To clarify, god doesn’t exist and Jesus wasn’t god.
Thanks for your response - much appreciated.
I am intrigued by the fact that billions of people believe in god, in the absence of any evidence other than a holy book that even believers admits is full of myths and fiction.
Is the bible the word of god, or is it the collected myths of Iron...