Search results

You haven't seen me play :ROFLMAO:

I look forward to reading a peer reviewed scientific paper on the effects of prayer.

What direction are they pointing? In or out?

I don't know why you say "Wow" - your behaviour is the definition of zealotry. Interesting article you cite: "In the earliest literature of the Jewish Rabbis, Jesus was denounced as the illegitimate child of Mary and a sorcerer. Among pagans, the satirist Lucian and philosopher Celsus...

Looks like my "running away" was a good move. What have I missed (apart from some Deep Purple and Led Zep)?

There are many, many other religions where followers believed enough to write holy books. Does that mean that they are also true?

Clear proof that the Quran and the Book of Mormon are also true.

Grave was quite possibly robbed, but probably not by Jesus's followers. The tomb was owned by Joseph of Arimathea, a member of the Sanhedrin council that unanimously condemned Jesus to death. The tomb was guarded by Roman soldiers, the people who carried out the punishment. The gospels made up...

Because Jesus is an Islamic prophet. Perhaps he told them the truth? (Not believing, just saying)

So, for you, a holy book with lots of errors is more convincing than one with no errors? In that case, my man, the bible is made for you. Enjoy. You're on ignore from here on in.

The discrepancies I pointed out question whether Jesus was the son of god. That is an important point, with which you appear to agree with me. And if you read the end of the gospels about the trial, the crucifixion, the resurrection and what happens next - you'll see that the gospels disagree...

The gospels disagree with each other - on many major points, but Christians somehow think it still makes sense.

You’re very good at this ruse. You’ve lost the argument, so you try to switch the debate. Stop it. Complete the point that is being discussed. In this case, you do accept my evidence, so why is my conclusion wrong? Please explain. Are you a Christian arguing your corner badly, or are you a troll?

Some people seem to be better at asking questions than answering them.

But I can conclude that Matthew is false, or Luke is false. So which is it?

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and ask again. If I am wrong, please explain why my evidence is not valid, or what is wrong with my argument?

Deuteronomy 23:2 is also interesting. Remind me, was Joseph Jesus's Dad?

If I'm so obviously wrong, please tell me what is wrong with my evidence and my argument.

The ball is in your court to provide evidence. But I will address your points. To establish whether Jesus was real or not I read the New Testament. With so many contradictions it is very clear that Jesus, as described in the bible, did not exist. You don't have to look past his birth. Matthew...

Can you please provide evidence that god exists, that he created the universe and life on earth, and that Jesus is his son?