This WFA furore is the same old bullshit.
Successive governments have failed to tax the nation to the levels necessary, to secure the future prosperity of the country.
Now that the country is totally skint, the generation that have benefitted the most, are moaning about injustice.
Yeah, right.
Local delivery from coop - when I'm WFH and don't have time to get out to the shops.
Frequently have voucher codes for £5 off - no mark up on the prices.
Delivery from £1.99
Great value.
All of the debates are trying to find a way for not giving Rice a yellow.
They are all tying themselves in contradictory knots with examples of decisions they think indicate the yellow card should not have been awarded.
I had a long twitter spat with a gooner providing all of the lame...
Similarly the Pedro "must be a yellow" doesn't seem to qualify , as kicking the ball away needs to be after the ref has stopped play
Not particularly well worded as the comma implies that only provoking a confrontation needs to be after the ref has stopped.
But if purely for kicking...
Sorry my point was how bad Velts challenge was.
Initially I felt yelllow for both.
On first viewing I thought he's deliberately kicked him, but on second (actually more like 168th viewing) it looks like the contact is more calf on knee.
And that's predominantly because rice gets in the way.
Hard to say but it looks like Velts foot doesn't actually touch Rice at all.
I think he catches him with his leg.
And only does so because Rice moves into his path.
If it was a deliberate kick, to cause damage, it's a very poor attempt from a professional footballer.