Well for one, they wouldn't have existed. But even if we pretend they would have existed and they could prove their lives would have been better, they can't prove who's to blame.
The British did not rampage around Africa rounding up free people, they bought people who were already slaves.
The economy in parts of Africa also benefited from slavery, so should they give back? And what about the lives of British people lost in stopping other countries trading in slaves? Who's going to pay for their loss?
Exactly.
African slavery started before the British were involved and continued after the British stopped, and Britain played a key role in ending it.
People want to rewrite history.
So if we have the stats of games Olise did/didn't start, the stats would be:
With:
Played 9
Won 7
Drawn 1
Lost 1
Without:
Played 17
Won 1
Drawn 6
Lost 10
A fair number (not sure exact number). Yes, there was a process, but some aspects do seem to have been messed up (one of the jobs Mrs T applied for wasn't offered to anyone, and when someone else saw that it was available they asked to switch to it, and they were given the job - Mrs T has a...
Thanks. If a new job is offered which a very small amount lower salary per year, then I'd guess it's unreasonable to reject it on that point, and equally if the salary was half of the existing, then obviously that's not fair, and it's very reasonable to turn it down. Somewhere in between it's...
Mrs T's job no longer exists, along with a bunch of other jobs at her place of work.
Employees have been assessed at a talent development centre, there has been a chance to apply for jobs in the new structure, and some employees have been redeployed.
Mrs T did not get one of the new jobs she...