Search results

I do recall that after we massacred Norwich, the failed signing was walking away (didnt take the team coach) with his erstwhile good lady. As the north stand drinkers saw them walk by, they were spontaneously serenaded (think lady and the tramp....only more like sneaky little twerp and tramp)...

Have I missed the march tv games announcement?

The pedro penalty is clear and obvious when you see it from behind which ironically is the angle the ref had. The defender takes the back leg out with a swipe. The second? The player has his arm excessively high in the jump(its above the attackers head) and makes contact. It really isnt that...

I believe as well as the 4 onfield decisions publicly checked there were 3 or 4 more done more discretely. All 7 or 8 stayed with the onfield decision. That in itself is unusual in the current day and age. I can understand wilder being frustrated. Their game plan relied on a prem ref constant...

i wanted to put a SIMILE on your face but found trying to think of one was as HARD as a cliftonville sausage and left me as BREATHLESS as your sauce

Mollie sees it as did Evie. Hence why Jaz needs to bring that together and go after andrew now and then harry after

As ive said before. Evie's best hope (and maybe jaz) is to go after Andrew and hope mollie backs them. Harry is unlikely to defend him. Then its a 2-2 split as evie and jaz bot suspect harry. If harry gets mollie to back him and vote out jaz ((or evie) and its and its revealed theyre not...

So EVIE is in the firing line. She is doubting Andrew and now Harry HARRY would sell his granny to win ANDREW would share with Harry MOLLIE trusts harry but doubts Andrew JAZ doubts Harry and Andrew If Jaz and Evie gang up and can persuade Mollie to get Andrew out with them (Harru wont...

As this was a rescue pussy it is deemed a pre existing condition

What is so great is that any one of these people can win. Its open and can turn on a well placed analysis or a misplaced quote. I wouldn't mind who won.. Harry has largely played a great game. Mollie has been wonderfully naive. Jasmine does annoy me but cant has been robust under scrutiny...

Indeed it was. One of the other singers mimed too. However both did live concert vocals. This was the era of bands like 5000 volts who had a blonde lead singer who actually mimed to the vocals of Tina Charles (who later had her own successful career)

I do - enjoy it. Kids will watch on Sunday morning. I try to watch Saturday night Holds a happy place in our family. My eldest's 1st word was 'goal' watching Motd. He also used to lean on a poufe and dance to theme music

To be fair to Moyes he has resurrected his managerial career. Great at Preston, good at everton, hiding to nothing at utd, pony in spain, sunderland was a basket case, good at west ham 1st time, very good now

Last night highlighted Potter's challenge. In short Oneill has overtaken him as the most effective English manager having now done it at 2 top flight teams 2 years in a row..both with diminishing budgets (hence why smug eddie isnt even in the list) They were organised, effective and are now...

You've answered your own point. The ifab explanation (as i gave earlier) is the passage of play leading to a goal. That wasnt the case in either of the examples you give. Dermot Gallagher has given the game away on sky earlier. He was waffling about cant be expected to have the exact blade of...

I havent commented on them going public. Fwiw i think that is wrong Not sure i will take neville's judgement given how his man utd side surrounded and hassled refs As for your last point. That's pure hyperbole

The ifab wording says var can view incidents leading up to a goal. There is a clarification it needs to be in the same phase of play. Neither of which rules out a review here. As I say lee mason used var to cover his dunk free kick decision. So either he was wrong then or its wrong now

One other thing on this. Var is allowed to check all aspects leading up to the awarding of a goal. Why else did lee mason involve var in the dunk free kick v west brom incident? There appears tp be inconsistencies here that are needed to be clarified. So perhaps it may be that everybody, you...

They already moved the wall once as he moved the ball slightly right. They didnt see him do it a second time. Maybe they didnt expect him to move the foam as well. It was at that point it became cheating. Writing to the pgmol getting clarification will help everyone

So given the crime he was punished for isnt something he was still doing, then i'm not sure the addiction should have carried wait as a mitigation. After all its am offence to possess class a drugs even before youve taken them so addiction isnt a factor there either?