I think the problem is it's highly subjective. Also trying to dig into how exactly each category works led me into a cirlcle of buzz words , generalisations and puff. There are so many "experts" that i feel they've ended up with a camel ( a horse designed by a committee)
So turns out I have three people on ignore. One "hilarious" comedy poster, one ultra political poster and one who I find irrritating and occasionally goes on ignore when i just can't be arsed with their nonsense
I;m sorry i don't enter into discussion with these sort of people. They always act in bad faith and won't change their minds on anything no matter how much evidence you give them. The points are at best misleading or misrepresentation of the actual evidence. Some of it is just bullshit.