Search results

If he'd got it on target it'd have been blocked by the defender.

We seem to be going through the motions a bit. I think the pitch looks a bit heavy, which probably doesn't help.

Come on, I don't think 10 year olds would lower themselves to using such an outdated form of communication as an internet forum! I definitely don't think Junior Orange, who is a little older, would, as it involves both reading and writing! :D

Gosh, that is very sad news indeed. I didn't know hitony, but he's always been a familiar name spotted in the threads in my twenty-odd years as an NSC poster. His presence will be missed. :(

Sent off for preventing a broken nose :D

Yes, that is exactly right, not even deemed a foul, let alone the red card offence it actually was. I'm still more annoyed about Sheffield United though, as going down to ten men and giving them a sniff was just rubbish.

That isn't a given, they'd more likely just say no.

Yes, as it was a straight red. And, no he doesn't miss Rome, as the suspension is from domestic competition.

I'm surprised with the consistency of replys that that was a red. Foul yes, yellow possibly, but he didn't go in two footed and he didn't go in studs up, so not a red for me.

I probably wasn't quite as clear in my phrasing as I intended, anybody who only paid attention to the news and didn't pay attention beyond that would certainly think nothing practical was happening. Whether what is actually being done is of any benefit it is a separate discussion. The green...

There definitely appears to be an industry, on both sides of the argument, around the politics of climate change. What we are sadly lacking in my opinion is a pragmatic and informed approach from that discourse to looking after our environment - with 'stop it' on one side, and 'we can't afford...

Does the 'T' stand for twat?

Got to condemn racism wherever it crops up. That tackle was appalling irrespective of Holgate's skin tone.

Didn't Adam El-Abd take a stud to the thigh once. I'm sure there is a (not for the faint hearted) picture of the result somewhere.

"Being silenced by the deep state" is what will be claimed.

Ah, yes, well, self-id could well skew things in terms of the female records, so you can sort of understand why they'd just not show them - it's just the unintended consequences of trying to be inclusive. Records probably aren't that important for events that aren't supposed to be competitive...

NAME 5K SB 5K PB 5K SB AG 10K 10M HM M GNT 20:42 20:12 84.22% 40:31 1:19:12 1:31:18 4:19:55 Big Nuts 18:20 18:00 76.33% 38:10 1:05:38 1:24:23 3:04:49 Simgull 22:08 20:21 70.63% 42:45 1:11:46 1:38:14 3:44:28 Artie Fufkin 16:55 % 35:47 1:15:58 2:42:07...

Okay, I understand now, Sunak was referring to Starmer's earlier 99.9% of woman don't have a penis comment from April. Still very odd, seems like a storm in a teacup to me, though given the context of who was expected to be present I can see why people might assume it wasn't just a dig at...

The video in that tweet was cut weirdly, but it sounded like Sunak was questioning whether Starmer knew how to define a woman? I thought he'd already said 'adult female' back in July? All very odd.

I've edited my previous posts to include the transgender, as I think it is helpful to point out that "trans" seems to be being used to cover several quite separate and unrelated groupings. Your other link was quite informative, and I'm glad to see that there isn't really any rights issues, with...