Well yes, the lawyer acting for the victims has to take that position. As I said, depends on the degree of involvement of others - still doesn’t mean the current owners are culpable though. Potentially tough on them.
What he’s allegedly done sounds horrific, but I’m a bit uncomfortable with Harrods (and de facto the current owners who are clearly horrified) being the ‘target’ as a corporate entity. Depends on the extent to which it was aided/abetted I guess.
Hearts fans jumping aboard the TB train now……..they‘re having their understanding improved by some random Swede ??? :lol:
https://www.hmfckickback.co.uk/index.php?/topic/204962-brighton-tony-bloom/page/51/
It’s exactly as we had in investment banking - so-called ‘chinese walls’ (usually on meaning different floors with physical access controls) between, say, research and investment management, M&A and traders etc etc.
Old article, but mentioned in here...
Not quite what I’ve heard (including from ex-employees)……..there are multiple parts to the ‘process’ and they’re all kept very separate with the rocket scientists working on the respective elements only really aware of the bit they deal with (one or two published articles have said the same)...
It the second part - Starlizard won’t share the tools/algo (none of the staff even know how it all works)…….Hearts will get data/recommendations on players that we can’t (or don’t want to) sign but will a) improve them and b) represent good investments