Search results

RIP Russell. I’ll miss his quiet, wry wit.

Couldn’t agree more. I’ve spoken to Julian on a few occasions about implementation issues on some of their initiatives, and he’s always been very helpful.

This surprised me, so I went looking for the terms of reference on the FAB and clubs’ websites and can’t find any. Are there any agreed terms of reference listing either the areas that are within scope or listing those out of scope? If so, could you point me to them please. Thx!

It is indeed. Thanks for the heads up. … and needs completing by noon on Friday…

Blimey; really? To be clear, I’m not questioning the veracity of the statement, just that the club (have to?) rely on a 3rd party to do something so simple…

I agree with your comments about the number of interviews. To get into Meta, he had 9!

My son currently works for Meta doing techie stuff across facewank, WhatsApp and Insta. He’s done 6 interviews with OpenAI and has the final one on Tuesday. We’ve been discussing the relative merits and risks of him accepting an offer, should one be extended. He’s thinking of a 12-24 month...

And Balderdash in goal?

I could be wrong, but I imagine that @El Presidente has a selection of films containing girls going wild in turns.

Have you brought your boots? Your club needs you!

Heresy, I know, but I’ve always thought that the Regents is a much more accomplished painting than the Nightwatch, albeit much, much smaller of course.

Oh, I say. Take a bow.

There might soon be some contributions to this thread that could be interesting… ***Teaser Alert***

Given that not one of the people inside the facility (as shown on the cutaways from the planning application) are wearing colours, I suspect that’s exactly what it is.

All will run smoothly now.

That’s ok (irritating, but ok), providing there’s no further issues

:(

That pitch looks a bit waterlogged.

Were damp

:shrug: Indeed! Looks like it’s not going to be a problem - I’m glad.