Search results

Yeah they would say it was a red card and had no place in the game.

Yeah it was so obviously pre-meditated d designed to injure.

It really isn't.

I assume that is heavy sarcasm.

I was just using the same context as the op of my quote. They say Wiefer's bad passing shouldn't give him the same score as Mitoma and Minteh.

The blood is irrelevant here. There is a difference between a head (brain) injury and a facial injury.

You say that but he stopped them getting in decent chances. Just one shot from memory. The rest he defended well enough for the cross or shot to be poor.

Odd comment given Wieffer's successful pass completion was 90% and Mitoma and Minteh's were 79% and 69% respectively.

I think if he sets up a goal, gets an assist and makes something like the 2nd highest interceptions and pass completions in the game he will do ok.

The commentators also referred to Mitoma as Sarmiento on at least one occasion.... It was more likely that he was called over for something to do with contact...maybe we want you to review the contact or if the contact was as you thought...and the commentators incorrectly interpreted it.

The commentators don't know the laws of the game half the time so no, I wouldn't believe them in the slightest. But wait....you think they overturned it because they mistakenly thought there was no contact, did that quickly and efficiently and then at the same time decided to tweet a different...

Omg yes there was but 1) VAR never claimed there wasn't any and 2) the contact was CLEARLY not a foul. So the hugh bar was achieved.

I would suggest you get all the information first. VAR never overturned it for he reasons you state. They overturned it as the Everton player landed on Dunk's foot and that's not a foul. The official decision was tweeted out moments after the incident.

The thing Dyche, and some on here it seems, are missing is that being quicky and easily shown to be wrong is most certainly above the highest of bars perceivable. I understand Dyche as he as a conflict of interest and wants some "luck" in his way later from them, but others....seem to have an...

That was a perfectly good example of a good var usage. The infield decision was obviously wrong. They told the referee, they looked and overturned it quickly. No big delay and the correct result was achieved. I don't see how anyone can have an issue with that instance of var. In fact, the var...

I assume it's as he missed most of pre-season. Not fully fit. Nice position not to have to push him day one.

If they learn to stop doing that then it's a good thing. Also you shouldn't take medical advice from someone with a head injury as the injury can cause unreliable responses. Good to see the medical team do the right thing

Looks really promising!

So we won't see anything like that given as a penalty. I hope you are right but we all know it's not like that.

Very sensible. Head injuries shouldn't be risked.