You achieve them because your employer has faith in you to do them but the business owner is
To me a CEO is also not a all-powerful leader with unchecked power and decision-making authority. That’s where the club do get things wrong occasionally. An uncompromising position isn’t healthy.
The other comment is correct though - he’s a very well paid employee of the club. He’s paid for performance. But it’s TB who is the BHAFC fan and that’s the critical component.
Making money is fine but denying the 80+ year old widow near us the right to bring a thermos in on a cold winter night is just pathetic. State pensioner too.
New piece on BHAFC / Po Scandal link on Twitter. To avoid bringing NSC into disrepute I’ll not paste the link on here but it’s a good summation of the intricacies of morality/ethics in business.
This in a nutshell - the management style is autocratic. In business parlance we’re stakeholders but it feels we’re told things only.
People saying that fan engagement doesn’t apply because we’ve got TB. Well, we nearly had nothing - no voice, no ground, no club
We do need a method of...
As I said on Derek Chapman - yes, maybe time to go.
As for PB - I have my own views and others have theirs. The club get a huge amount right but when they do get things wrong they double down and don’t apologise.
It’s not me who is being insulting here is it.
I’ve no idea if he’s the best, I don’t know about his competition. So, yes - possibly but I’ve not seen the criteria.
As for being a suit - he’s a senior executive of the club, he is not a BHAFC fan.
When the club has been found wanting...
Insults? What insults? I’ve an opinion which you might not agree with. Just stating he’s possibly the best CEO in the PL - if you're happy with that then alright then. You go with that.
Everyone’s fallible.
As for contradicting..?