Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Fabian I was wrong



Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
13,260
The bad run was literally 2 games - that was what was so rediculous - so it's fairly certain we'll have similar bad runs again. Prior to the home defeat at Everton, we'd had 3 wins and 2 draws against Arse and Villa!
The bad run was significantly more than 2 games.
That's just as much of a clueless statement as some of the guff, I spouted in the aftermath of the Forest game.

November 29th - December 30th 7 games - 5pts
0 wins & 5 Draws against Leicester, Southampton, Brentford, West Ham and Villa
2 absolutely clueless losses to Palace & Fulham
 




dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
57,204
Burgess Hill
The bad run was significantly more than 2 games.
That's just as much of a clueless statement as some of the guff, I spouted in the aftermath of the Forest game.

November 29th - December 30th 7 games - 5pts
0 wins & 5 Draws against Leicester, Southampton, Brentford, West Ham and Villa
2 absolutely clueless losses to Palace & Fulham
So not really a run then. Just a series of inconsistent results with one freak result.
 


Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
13,260
So not really a run then. Just a series of inconsistent results with one freak result.
no wins in 7 games is not a bad run now?

Which freak result was that?
Losing tamely and naively to Palace or Fulham?

Not really a freak result, when they happen 2 weeks apart, surely?
 


Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
18,282
Fiveways
It's a difference in expectations. If 0.714ppg over seven games really constitutes a bad run, then methinks we're doing OK. Especially given that: 1, that run spread over the season would in all likelihood generate PL survival; 2, when you look at the best metric to predict final positions in the PL -- player wages spend -- we're about 14th or 15th.
 






Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
13,260
It's a difference in expectations. If 0.714ppg over seven games really constitutes a bad run, then methinks we're doing OK. Especially given that: 1, that run spread over the season would in all likelihood generate PL survival; 2, when you look at the best metric to predict final positions in the PL -- player wages spend -- we're about 14th or 15th.

We would be 2 pts above the relegation places if we had averaged that many points per game.
 


FamilyGuy

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2003
2,601
Crawley
Why does he repeat everything he says ?
It's a presentation technique; tell people you're gonna say it, say it, and then tell 'em you've said it.

I'm not suggesting that its a good technique.
 


HCxUK

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2014
1,027
It's a presentation technique; tell people you're gonna say it, say it, and then tell 'em you've said it.

I'm not suggesting that its a good technique.

To be honest, it probably isn't the worst tactic considering he has a dressing room full of young people and English isn't the first language for a lot of them.

It might seem a bit simplistic and cringy to us, and maybe to a few of the older English/Dutch players too, but the messaging being clear and concise (easy to understand!) is probably for the greater good.
 




Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

I believe in Joe Hendry
Oct 4, 2003
12,481
It's a difference in expectations. If 0.714ppg over seven games really constitutes a bad run, then methinks we're doing OK. Especially given that: 1, that run spread over the season would in all likelihood generate PL survival; 2, when you look at the best metric to predict final positions in the PL -- player wages spend -- we're about 14th or 15th.

0.7 ppg over a season is 26 points, that isn’t enough for survival most seasons. Currently Wolves in 17th are averaging 0.8 per game.
 










Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
64,074
The Fatherland
I teach across London and a large number of students are SEN, so repetition is helpful. Most of our team are SEN.
Most of our team are Zen? I guess Mitoma's influence is beyond just football ?
 


Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
18,282
Fiveways
0.7 ppg over a season is 26 points, that isn’t enough for survival most seasons. Currently Wolves in 17th are averaging 0.8 per game.
You need to finish above 18th in order to survive and, currently, 0.714ppg would be sufficient. It was an extreme example given to illustrate that 'the bad run' -- extended from the seven games to 38 -- would even keep us up this season. We're currently on a good run in the PL -- fifteen points out of 21, which is 2.14ppg.

We will continue to have bad runs. That's the key point to get across. Anyone that thinks otherwise will be very busy on the Fab OUT thread dispensing their own special brand of misery, entitlement, etc.
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
58,599
Faversham
The bad run was literally 2 games - that was what was so rediculous - so it's fairly certain we'll have similar bad runs again. Prior to the home defeat at Everton, we'd had 3 wins and 2 draws against Arse and Villa!
Are you suggesting that all that hysteria was a load of b**-w****** horse shit?

Gosh.

:wink:
 


Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
13,260
Define the run to suit your own narrative - can't be arsed to argue. I'm glass at least half full. 😊

I think that's what you were doing tbh.

My narrative is that the manager has proved he's got what it takes to succeed at this level.
But in the midst of that run, where we were regularly conceding multiple goals from a strong position, and throwing away points, I was definitely not glass half full. :)
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
57,204
Burgess Hill
I think that's what you were doing tbh.

My narrative is that the manager has proved he's got what it takes to succeed at this level.
But in the midst of that run, where we were regularly conceding multiple goals from a strong position, and throwing away points, I was definitely not glass half full. :)
The 'bad run' didn't end at Everton/Forest. We'd won 3 consecutive away games before that :shrug: Forest was a freak result
 






Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
13,260
The 'bad run' didn't end at Everton/Forest. We'd won 3 consecutive away games before that :shrug: Forest was a freak result
Forest was a Freak result.
But defensive lapses, where goals were given away cheaply wasn't.

We had concede 2 goals within 10 minutes of each other in 3consecutive games prior to those wins .
It would have been 4 if not for a fortuitous VAR call against Southampton.
This was following on from throwing away points against Wolves, with 2 goals in 4 minutes.

We headed the table of points lost from winning positions and it was a real problem.
Fabs decision to throw caution to the wind and experiment against Forest, was insane.

I am over the moon with the defensive displays since Forest, because it was a massive gap in the way we were playing.
But pretending that the issue was that we weren't trusting the process enough, is a little misplaced, IMO.
 


Mellor 3 Ward 4

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2004
10,420
saaf of the water
He's young - he's learning, he's made mistakes and who really knows the story (if there is one) behind the Ferguson issue.

Hopefully he's learnt that you can't play one central midfielder on their own, especially when said midfielder is 19 and was coming back from a long injury.

Certainly didn't look like he's lost the dressing room in that video from the Newcastle dressing room.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here