Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Lucy Letby



jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
16,185
Either way, can only result in a mistrial.
This is possible but unlikely. As I discussed above, the reason for the crown hiring respected legal teams for each side for high profile cases is to prevent exactly this.

More common causes of retrials upon appeal are very strong new evidence, provable prosecutorial misconduct such as withholding discovery, or evidence from an independent inquiry.
 






nickjhs

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 9, 2017
1,695
Ballarat, Australia
Am I right in thinking, all of the evidence was circumstantial? But I’m sure I read something about some very incriminating diaries Letby kept in her home.
From what I have read it is all circumstantial and the diaries are very much open to interpretation. It is enough for me that so many respected experts are prepared to put their necks out speaking against how the trial and evidence were run. I can think of very few things worse than being locked away for life when innocent. For me there is enough for the verdict to be squashed and a new trial set.
 


jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
16,185
From what I have read it is all circumstantial and the diaries are very much open to interpretation. It is enough fo me that so many respected experts are prepared to put their necks out speaking against how the trial and evidence were run.
I’m very much a bowing down to the judicial system sort of guy anyway. I didn’t see and hear all the evidence, it’s why we have a jury system
 


nickjhs

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 9, 2017
1,695
Ballarat, Australia
I’m very much a bowing down to the judicial system sort of guy anyway. I didn’t see and hear all the evidence, it’s why we have a jury system
Nothing is perfect, and the jury can only go by what they are presented with. From what I have heard the "expert" who testified for the prosecution is somewhat iffy. There are enough people who understand the details speaking out for there to be a retrial. Don't forget part of the justice system is the ability to raise concerns and appeal.
 




jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
16,185
Nothing is perfect, and the jury can only go by what they are presented with. From what I have heard the "expert" who testified for the prosecution is somewhat iffy. There are enough people who understand the details speaking out for there to be a retrial. Don't forget part of the justice system is the ability to raise concerns and appeal.
Absolutely, which is why I think it’s in the hands of the judicial system. I think the jury found her guilty based on what was presented to them, but whether that is true or not I don’t know. But it’s all we have
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
50,496
Gloucester
Nothing is perfect, and the jury can only go by what they are presented with. From what I have heard the "expert" who testified for the prosecution is somewhat iffy. There are enough people who understand the details speaking out for there to be a retrial. Don't forget part of the justice system is the ability to raise concerns and appeal.
What's the alternative? A retrial on NSC? Sorry, there's always people trying to make a name for themselves (and money) by trying to 'prove' that the law got it wrong.

See under 'Hanratty, James'.
 


SouthSaxon

Stand or fall
NSC Patron
Jan 25, 2025
277
What's the alternative? A retrial on NSC? Sorry, there's always people trying to make a name for themselves (and money) by trying to 'prove' that the law got it wrong.

See under 'Hanratty, James'.
Not sure I get your point. There’s also been plenty of cases of people being exonerated after a guilty verdict in a jury trial. Including cases of this type.
 




nickjhs

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 9, 2017
1,695
Ballarat, Australia
Absolutely, which is why I think it’s in the hands of the judicial system. I think the jury found her guilty based on what was presented to them, but whether that is true or not I don’t know. But it’s all we have
The issue I have with the judicial system is that it can get bogged down in technicalities, especially the appeals process. This would appear to be a classic case where a lot of experts are calling for a mistrial but the parameters for granting one are so narrow these calls are in danger of being ignored.
 


jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
16,185
The issue I have with the judicial system is that it can get bogged down in technicalities, especially the appeals process. This would appear to be a classic case where a lot of experts are calling for a mistrial but the parameters for granting one are so narrow these calls are in danger of being ignored.
I think the public interest is so high it will happen. The problem is the many who have suffered miscarriages of justice who don’t have millions of pounds worth of lawyering working on their case while they’re in prison
 






Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here