Ethelwulf
Well-known member
Really poor brought a copy today and not even a match report in the paper for last nights game and £1.15 now .
No report as paper printed before Brian Owen can file his report. His report was available online and tomorrows Argus will have a full report and analysis.Really poor brought a copy today and not even a match report in the paper for last nights game and £1.15 now .
Yet look who was on the front page in yesterday’s edition… Bottom rightReally poor brought a copy today and not even a match report in the paper for last nights game and £1.15 now .
No report as paper printed before Brian Owen can file his report. His report was available online and tomorrows Argus will have a full report and analysis.
I agree but whilst the Argus reports on local stuff, it’s printed in Hampshire and is just one of the papers owned by Newsquest who I doubt care very much about a report on a football match. Gone are the days of “hold the front page” or back page.Then they printed it too early. Not a very good local paper if they can't time it to get a report from the local PL side in the next day's paper.
I agree but whilst the Argus reports on local stuff, it’s printed in Hampshire and is just one of the papers owned by Newsquest who I doubt care very much about a report on a football match. Gone are the days of “hold the front page” or back page.
The problem being that first of all they are no longer a local paper - I don't want to know about what's happened in Rye, Crawley or Bognor. They lost their localisation when they started to use national reporters to report stories. Reporters with no local knowledge. Hell, there was even a story published a couple of years ago about a woman that "saved" an old table by rubbing it down and painting it. She was based in ..... BoltonI'm going to defend our local paper.
We moan about it being rubbish so we don't buy it, so their finances go down and they have to sack reporters thus their reporting goes down.
What if they had say 5 local reporters covering events in Sussex but based in Brighton, Eastbourne, Mid, East & West Sussex. When an event occurs they would be on it quick and their 'Live' page would be just that, our go to source. Drop a lot of the ads on screen giving a better home page. And for gods sake, give the true story on facebook rather than clickbait.
And I'm with you all the way. It's just that we've come to this simply because they got worse and readers left. It's a circle.The problem being that first of all they are no longer a local paper - I don't want to know about what's happened in Rye, Crawley or Bognor. They lost their localisation when they started to use national reporters to report stories. Reporters with no local knowledge. Hell, there was even a story published a couple of years ago about a woman that "saved" an old table by rubbing it down and painting it. She was based in ..... Bolton
Most of what they publish is mind numbing rubbish so there's no way I'm going to actually pay for it. Stories about their trips to restaurants ( with the reporter trying to be a new Grace Dent ), summaries of hygiene scores that any of us could look up on the council website, Rightmove screen scrapes etc etc etc. If they want people to pay then they need to publish proper news - not the dumbed down paste and copy stuff their American owners want them to do to save money. Vicious circle really, publish rubbish and people will stop paying, people stop paying so they cut more costs thus producing even worse rubbish.
One benefit if they go under would be Cllr Lyons no longer being able to spew his stupid comments nor would we have to suffer Steve 'hypocrite' Davis' regular column.
I had paid for thatAnd heres the article about Brightons best Land Lord
Mod edit: Sorry - we can't have whole copy and pastes from other media outlets on here - they deserve the eyeballs / ad views / subscriptions.
Gone are the days of local papers generally, I'm afraid. They can no longer afford to employ a few 'Brighton Clark Kents' to shoot off to investigate local incidents, nor do they have the infrastructure to 'hold the front page'. Many of the jobs in the Newspaper industry we (or most of us) grew up in have gone the way of miners, bus-conductors, station porters - and many more.I agree but whilst the Argus reports on local stuff, it’s printed in Hampshire and is just one of the papers owned by Newsquest who I doubt care very much about a report on a football match. Gone are the days of “hold the front page” or back page.
It cares enough to run a preview of the match in yesterday's paper, though...I agree but whilst the Argus reports on local stuff, it’s printed in Hampshire and is just one of the papers owned by Newsquest who I doubt care very much about a report on a football match. Gone are the days of “hold the front page” or back page.