Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Film] Huge changes for 007….







Iggle Piggle

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 3, 2010
6,262
You are right though @jcdenton08 They will butcher and murder the franchise. Disney and Paramount have killed Star Trek and Star wars by trying to make it appeal to everyone. Unfortunately, most of it appeals to no one. The studios got complacent and thought the long term fans would watch it anyway. By trying to make lots of "content"for everyone, they've killed the brands. No one is watching Strange new worlds or Skeleton crew. Most people don't even know it's existence.

Bond kills people and goes out for a Martini, game of cards and pulls the best looking girl in the casino to celebrate. Good luck making all that compatible with the core and modern audiences.
 


jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
16,096
Had a similar thought and it will be a DEI cast as well, which while I am ok with, its not what 007 is about. Wait for the "Tango Man" to claim James Bond is a US hero. :facepalm:
I think both are possible. I’ve got an open mind about casting but I agree with Broccoli, he must be a man and he must be British.
 




METALMICKY

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2004
7,190
Went from an unpopular model costing around £100 to becoming a sought after one costing about £500 after Skyfall came out
If we're talking Bond clobber and style surely this is the pinnacle? He made some great suits but designer Anthony Sinclair knocked it out of the park with the Goldfinger 3 piece gray glen plaid. Superb!

1000009264.jpg
 








LamieRobertson

Not awoke
Feb 3, 2008
49,318
SHOREHAM BY SEA
I can obviously tell from the majority of the replies here that many aren’t Bond fans - that’s fine. But loads are, like me.

And sorry to be boring and actually discuss the topic at hand, but I am very concerned about what Amazon will do to the franchise.

They haven’t acquired it only in order to make a film every three years. They want a big return on investment. Big shades of Disney’s buying Star Wars. Multiple spin-offs of varying quality and saturation of the brand. Exactly what Barbara Broccoli was so against.

Keeping Bond as a rare treat is fully in line with the character and with the Bond universe. He is portrayed as “premium” in everything he does, the designer watches, the cars, the stunning women.

A Bond movie every three to five years is an EVENT and whether you enjoy Bond movies or not, it gets everyone talking. From the casting, to the theme song - it’s always a highlight of the cinematic year and intrudes into wider culture.

I personally think having a Q spin off series, a Moneypenny spin off series, origin stories for pre-007 Bond and all the other ideas they’ll be developing hugely cheapens the brand.

Back in the day, there were three Star Wars movies and the series was considered a classic. Then they said, “instead of making no more money… why don’t we make loads more money?” and made another three. And another three. And spin off movies. And spin off series. And animated series. And a multiverse, and Lego Star Wars and comics and so on.

And now that franchise has long been a joke; but at least Disney made a shit ton of money.

This is exactly what I see happening to Bond.

Oh and I bet they do something silly with the casting. Amazon will want Americans in this.
With you 100%
 




JBizzle

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2010
6,545
Seaford
You are right though @jcdenton08 They will butcher and murder the franchise. Disney and Paramount have killed Star Trek and Star wars by trying to make it appeal to everyone. Unfortunately, most of it appeals to no one. The studios got complacent and thought the long term fans would watch it anyway. By trying to make lots of "content"for everyone, they've killed the brands. No one is watching Strange new worlds or Skeleton crew. Most people don't even know it's existence.

Bond kills people and goes out for a Martini, game of cards and pulls the best looking girl in the casino to celebrate. Good luck making all that compatible with the core and modern audiences.
Well that's total balls for a start Strange New Worlds consistently ranked in the top 10 streaming shows for it's last series in 2023. It's actually an unqualified success, hence it being renewed for season 3 and season 4.

Strange New Worlds and Skeleton Crew are really enjoyable, that's speaking as someone who has loved both franchises since the 80s and as the father of a 10 year old who adored Lower Decks, Prodigy and Skeleton Crew.

Star Wars has been far more patchy in terms of overall quality to be fair, but otherwise almost the entirely of your post is total nonsense.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
58,345
Faversham
I can obviously tell from the majority of the replies here that many aren’t Bond fans - that’s fine. But loads are, like me.

And sorry to be boring and actually discuss the topic at hand, but I am very concerned about what Amazon will do to the franchise.

They haven’t acquired it only in order to make a film every three years. They want a big return on investment. Big shades of Disney’s buying Star Wars. Multiple spin-offs of varying quality and saturation of the brand. Exactly what Barbara Broccoli was so against.

Keeping Bond as a rare treat is fully in line with the character and with the Bond universe. He is portrayed as “premium” in everything he does, the designer watches, the cars, the stunning women.

A Bond movie every three to five years is an EVENT and whether you enjoy Bond movies or not, it gets everyone talking. From the casting, to the theme song - it’s always a highlight of the cinematic year and intrudes into wider culture.

I personally think having a Q spin off series, a Moneypenny spin off series, origin stories for pre-007 Bond and all the other ideas they’ll be developing hugely cheapens the brand.

Back in the day, there were three Star Wars movies and the series was considered a classic. Then they said, “instead of making no more money… why don’t we make loads more money?” and made another three. And another three. And spin off movies. And spin off series. And animated series. And a multiverse, and Lego Star Wars and comics and so on.

And now that franchise has long been a joke; but at least Disney made a shit ton of money.

This is exactly what I see happening to Bond.

Oh and I bet they do something silly with the casting. Amazon will want Americans in this.
I know what you mean but I don't care.
The old stuff can't be tainted if I put the new shit on ignore.

I disagree with a small point about Star Wars. I understood there were always meant to be 9 movies. I read that in the 70s (and thought it was all a bit silly so I never saw any of the movies till 30 years later).
 


Couldn't Be Hyypia

We've come a long long way together
NSC Patron
Nov 12, 2006
17,050
Near Bridport, Dorset
I can obviously tell from the majority of the replies here that many aren’t Bond fans - that’s fine. But loads are, like me.

And sorry to be boring and actually discuss the topic at hand, but I am very concerned about what Amazon will do to the franchise.

They haven’t acquired it only in order to make a film every three years. They want a big return on investment. Big shades of Disney’s buying Star Wars. Multiple spin-offs of varying quality and saturation of the brand. Exactly what Barbara Broccoli was so against.

Keeping Bond as a rare treat is fully in line with the character and with the Bond universe. He is portrayed as “premium” in everything he does, the designer watches, the cars, the stunning women.

A Bond movie every three to five years is an EVENT and whether you enjoy Bond movies or not, it gets everyone talking. From the casting, to the theme song - it’s always a highlight of the cinematic year and intrudes into wider culture.

I personally think having a Q spin off series, a Moneypenny spin off series, origin stories for pre-007 Bond and all the other ideas they’ll be developing hugely cheapens the brand.

Back in the day, there were three Star Wars movies and the series was considered a classic. Then they said, “instead of making no more money… why don’t we make loads more money?” and made another three. And another three. And spin off movies. And spin off series. And animated series. And a multiverse, and Lego Star Wars and comics and so on.

And now that franchise has long been a joke; but at least Disney made a shit ton of money.

This is exactly what I see happening to Bond.

Oh and I bet they do something silly with the casting. Amazon will want Americans in this.
Not sure where the idea of occasionally released gems came from.

Perhaps in recent years as the popularity has declined?

1000019067.png
 




Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,890
hassocks
They're either going to do a really good job, or they're going to absolutely butcher it.

Barbara Broccoli was fiercely defensive of the legacy she (and her step-brother) were left.
They covered this recently on the Rest is Entertainment podcast and they said that in a meeting with Amazon she was outraged when someone on the Amazon side referred to James Bond as 'content', which is quite telling about how Amazon view the Bond 'franchise'.
Given what have seen with DIsney and Star Wars/Marvel in recent years and pumping out something weekly, I am going with ruin
 


jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
16,096
I disagree with a small point about Star Wars. I understood there were always meant to be 9 movies. I read that in the 70s (and thought it was all a bit silly so I never saw any of the movies till 30 years later).
I’m not sure that they intended the films to get such a mixed to negative reception from fans and critics alike. There is/was nobody there fighting the corner of the character and the franchise, there’s just people whose job it is to make as much money as quickly as possible and to hell with saturation and the future. “The marks will still buy it”.

Sometimes it needs a strong person who actually believes in the material to put their foot down and say no. But when a huge company like Disney or Amazon come along, their only interest is money, and they have carte blanche to f*** everything up in pursuit of that money
 


jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
16,096
Not sure where the idea of occasionally released gems came from.

Perhaps in recent years as the popularity has declined?

View attachment 197084
I think you’ve misunderstood my point.

That is the entirety of the Bond output on screen in the last six decades. There have been no spin-off TV shows, no origin stories for Felix Leiter, no The Adventures of Q, no Miss Moneypenny Investigates. This has been deliberate to keep the movies an event.

Now Amazon has taken over creative control, we are going to be saturated with Bond content, and as always, when the quantity goes up, the quality goes down.

Edit: I’m not sure where you got that the popularity has declined has come from? No Time to Die made $886m in the box office, well over $1.2bn including rentals and home sales. Spectre is in the top five, and number one is Skyfall, which while 13 years ago now is still one of the most recent Bond films.
 






Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,890
hassocks
I think you’ve misunderstood my point.

That is the entirety of the Bond output on screen in the last six decades. There have been no spin-off TV shows, no origin stories for Felix Leiter, no The Adventures of Q, no Miss Moneypenny Investigates. This has been deliberate to keep the movies an event.

Now Amazon has taken over creative control, we are going to be saturated with Bond content, and as always, when the quantity goes up, the quality goes down.

Edit: I’m not sure where you got that the popularity has declined has come from? No Time to Die made $886m in the box office, well over $1.2bn including rentals and home sales. Spectre is in the top five, and number one is Skyfall, which while 13 years ago now is still one of the most recent Bond films.
TV series can work as Andor/Mando/Wandavision Showed, but they were the exception in my view.

The recent stuff has been absolute dross
 




Iggle Piggle

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 3, 2010
6,262
Well that's total balls for a start Strange New Worlds consistently ranked in the top 10 streaming shows for it's last series in 2023. It's actually an unqualified success, hence it being renewed for season 3 and season 4.

Strange New Worlds and Skeleton Crew are really enjoyable, that's speaking as someone who has loved both franchises since the 80s and as the father of a 10 year old who adored Lower Decks, Prodigy and Skeleton Crew.

Star Wars has been far more patchy in terms of overall quality to be fair, but otherwise almost the entirely of your post is total nonsense.

Strange New Worlds is alright as was the early series of Discovery but....The later series of Discovery are shite, Section 31 movie is shite and the rebooted films all had their problems to say the least.

As for Star Wars, the new films bar Rogue one are all a mess, The Acolyte was shite, Ashoka is so so, The book of Bobby fett is laughably bad and Andor is excellent. Skeleton crew maybe good but my point is we've given up watching or caring. We watched the first one and haven't made it to 2. My lads would rather watch the excellent Severance or Silo rather than staggering through another star wars series. Our goodwill probably ended with the Acolyte.

Put it this way, It's all a far cry from Empire and Wrath of Khan. As I'm pretty sure whatever Amazon will do to Bond will be from Russia with love or Casino Royale.
 




Couldn't Be Hyypia

We've come a long long way together
NSC Patron
Nov 12, 2006
17,050
Near Bridport, Dorset
I think you’ve misunderstood my point.

That is the entirety of the Bond output on screen in the last six decades. There have been no spin-off TV shows, no origin stories for Felix Leiter, no The Adventures of Q, no Miss Moneypenny Investigates. This has been deliberate to keep the movies an event.

Now Amazon has taken over creative control, we are going to be saturated with Bond content, and as always, when the quantity goes up, the quality goes down.

Edit: I’m not sure where you got that the popularity has declined has come from? No Time to Die made $886m in the box office, well over $1.2bn including rentals and home sales. Spectre is in the top five, and number one is Skyfall, which while 13 years ago now is still one of the most recent Bond films.
I understand what you are saying about the spin offs, but I'm nit sure the pace of releases supports the point you made "A Bond movie every three to five years is an EVENT and whether you enjoy Bond movies or not, it gets everyone talking. From the casting, to the theme song - it’s always a highlight of the cinematic year and intrudes into wider culture." - historically they were rolled out at the pace of Carry On movies (and seem to me to be about as relevant). I'm not for a second saying you shouldn't love them - it wouldn't do to be all the same.
 


JBizzle

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2010
6,545
Seaford
Strange New Worlds is alright as was the early series of Discovery but....The later series of Discovery are shite, Section 31 movie is shite and the rebooted films all had their problems to say the least.

As for Star Wars, the new films bar Rogue one are all a mess, The Acolyte was shite, Ashoka is so so, The book of Bobby fett is laughably bad and Andor is excellent. Skeleton crew maybe good but my point is we've given up watching or caring. We watched the first one and haven't made it to 2. My lads would rather watch the excellent Severance or Silo rather than staggering through another star wars series. Our goodwill probably ended with the Acolyte.

Put it this way, It's all a far cry from Empire and Wrath of Khan. As I'm pretty sure whatever Amazon will do to Bond will be from Russia with love or Casino Royale.
I don't disagree with much of that, it's all about opinions. My challenge was that "no-one's watching these things". Discovery was divisive before it even started, but season 1 and 2 were pretty good; season 3 and 4 were, plot-wise, very poor; season 5 was actually on an upward trajectory. The movies though, I do agree. Section 31 took the worst character in Discovery and made a film about her because Michelle Yeoh won an Oscar and the Abrams films were "fine", but made by a different studio.

It says something that the best recent Star Wars films weren't the "mainline" ones. Solo was actually pretty good fun, but came out just after The Last Jedi which was divisive, to say the least. Incidentally, I actually enjoyed the, albeit flawed, Acolyte, but was bored to tears by the Book of Boba Fett. Mandalorian, Andor and Ahsoka were very solid shows and I'll likely still watch the new series if and when they make them.

I think the problem is with the modern films in any of these franchises is that they simply cannot escape the legacy of "legendary" films. They're nowhere near the quality of the Empire Strikes back or The Wrath of Khan, and you're totally right on the Bond films. It's the same with the Indiana Jones films. The new ones are "fine" but not even close to Raiders of the Lost Ark. I don't think that's because they're trying to make worse films (although Star wars VII, VIII and IX challenge that statement pretty assertively), but they're being judged against genuine classics of not only the series but the genre.

A seriously high bar that I don't think they'll ever meet, Bond included.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here