The Clamp
Well-known member
Go back and read previous posts on these “letters”.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[News] Lucy Letby
- Thread starter Lenny Rider
- Start date
Do you not think this could be some mental breakdown?
If some many babies have died under her watch anyone would think they have done something wrong and be paranoid/mentally unstable.
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 73,295
I'd be strongly inclined to go with the doctors on the ground who first raised concerns. They wouldn't do that shit lightly
The Clamp
Well-known member
People absolutely have presented compelling arguments for her innocence;I think this one:
The devil’s advocates
Lucy Letby’s supporters have not produced any compelling evidence for a miscarriage of justice.www.spiked-online.com
Certainly the author of the article is reasonably sure of her guilt.
Lucy Letby murder convictions: what did the expert panel find?
Group concludes babies died due to natural causes or errors in medical care, saying there was no evidence of deliberate harm
www.theguardian.com
The Clamp
Well-known member
What concerns did they raise?
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 73,295
They wanted her off the baby ward. Look it up
The Clamp
Well-known member
Yes. What concerns did they raise?
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 73,295
Like I say, go look it up
chip
Well-known member
I know one of the panel and have worked with him in the past on an EU grant on diabetes and obesity.
‘Strong reasonable doubt’ over Lucy Letby insulin convictions, experts say
Exclusive: ‘No scientific justification’ to say former nurse definitely poisoned babies with insulin, according to study authors
www.theguardian.com
I think his background is chemical engineering, but he was certainly an expert in insulin dynamics when I knew him and that was his role in the project. He doesn't say she is not guilty. He does say that the cases of insulin posioning are not supported by the evidence presented. This seems to be a common theme in her conviction and she had a very lightweight defence team. I can't say is it is a miscarriage of justice but on Geoff's analysis it looks unsound.
The Clamp
Well-known member
I know what concerns they raised. I was trying to find out if you know.Like I say, go look it up
Clearly not.
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 73,295
Start making sense
For everyone else’s benefit what were the concerns? That Letby was harming babies or was incompetent or something else?
dsr-burnley
Well-known member
- Aug 15, 2014
- 2,805
From what I gathered from the court case, they ruled out the 10 because Letby wasn't there and then used the fact that she was there at the other 8 to be evidence of guilt. The original 18 were all deemed to be natural until they changed their mind and decided to look for murder.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,229
the other thing is the odd bed fellows this case has made. people seem to want to find her not guilty.
The Clamp
Well-known member
My post makes perfect sense.Start making sense
Anyhoo, let’s move on.
It’ll be very interesting to see if an appeal goes anywhere.
This seems very much like one of those cases of “That’s it. We found our culprit. Move on. Nothing to see here. Nope, don’t listen to doubters. She’s our murderer”
The Clamp
Well-known member
This article gives a good timeline and detail of the concerns raised.
Hospital bosses ignored months of doctors' warnings about Lucy Letby - BBC News
Hospital bosses failed to investigate allegations and tried to silence doctors, BBC investigation finds.
www.bbc.co.uk
dsr-burnley
Well-known member
- Aug 15, 2014
- 2,805
And another.
Sally Clark - Wikipedia
This case hinged on the idea that to get the odds of two related babies in the same house dying of cot death, you multiply the odds of one cot death by itself. This would only be true if cot death was not affected either by genetics or the environment in which they live, but the defence failed to pick up on this obvious flaw.
And remember that quite outlandishly improbable things happen every week. It's only 1 in 45,000,000 chance of winning the lottery, but it doesn't mean that the person who wins must have cheated.
Nobby Cybergoat
Well-known member
- Jul 19, 2021
- 9,313
Nobody should want anything, other than justice to be done.
I don't know what that is, but that's because i've only seen a fraction in the media of what would have been presented in court.
I have no reason to doubt our legal system. If there are problems with the evidence or any of the witnesses then she can rely on the available appeal procedures
ChickenDipper
Well-known member
- Nov 8, 2024
- 321
Posts on here aren’t evidence to anything…
Are you suggesting you think she’s innocent?