Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Free kicks inside the penalty area when was the last time one was awarded



Blue3

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2014
5,937
Lancing
Free kicks awarded in the penalty area are always indirect free kicks. Unlike a poorly timed slide tackle which often times results in a more or less clear cut decision for a penalty kick, indirect free kicks are given when a player commits an infringement that is less serious in nature

I cannot recall one in a good number of years are they no longer available to Refs, they were as I remember quite fun you might see a whole team standing on the goal line for a free kick closer than the penalty mark
 




Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
9,315
Good shout. They were enormous fun.

I don't know, but I would guess they are still on the rule book for obstruction. So if a defender fell on the ball, or trapped it between his knees or something it would still be given.

But maybe, refs in practice would do anything possible to avoid enforcing the rules as stated. They might be more tempted to blow for a non existent free kick to the defending team. Anything for a quiet life eh!
 




OvingdeanSeagull

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2012
769
Ovingdean
These still happen occasionally as a result of a back pass. Think Cole Palmer had one recently.

I've always wondered, theoretically, could the attacker just shoot and hope that it takes some kind of small deflection off either a team mate or defender on the line, deeming it indirect? Just smash it towards goal and it's sure to connect with someone before crossing the line.
 






Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
9,315
So we get one of these, centrally, 8 yards out. The opposition are massed on the goal line. Who do you want taking the shot? Welbeck? Dunk? Lamptey?
 








Commander

Arrogant Prat
NSC Patron
Apr 28, 2004
13,911
London
Good shout. They were enormous fun.

I don't know, but I would guess they are still on the rule book for obstruction. So if a defender fell on the ball, or trapped it between his knees or something it would still be given.

But maybe, refs in practice would do anything possible to avoid enforcing the rules as stated. They might be more tempted to blow for a non existent free kick to the defending team. Anything for a quiet life eh!
One rule I would change in football is to bring back an indirect free kick for obstruction. I know it was slightly different, but don't allow defenders to use their bodies to block an attacker from getting the ball and sheperding it out of play. Give an indirect free kick for that instead.

It would make for much more exciting football if defenders actually had to play that ball. More penalties, more corners, more goals.
 








Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
55,278
Surrey
Good shout. They were enormous fun.

I don't know, but I would guess they are still on the rule book for obstruction. So if a defender fell on the ball, or trapped it between his knees or something it would still be given.

But maybe, refs in practice would do anything possible to avoid enforcing the rules as stated. They might be more tempted to blow for a non existent free kick to the defending team. Anything for a quiet life eh!
I think Man City's penalty could arguably have been an indirect free kick inside the area. I'm not 100% sure Foden was fouled and was arguably obstructed. In fact I'm surprised it wasn't awarded as the powers that be normally do their best to assist Real Madrid, as evidenced by the 5 minute delay to award City's first goal looking for a hand ball that very clearly wasn't there after looking at it for 10 seconds.
 


Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
9,315
I think Man City's penalty could arguably have been an indirect free kick inside the area. I'm not 100% sure Foden was fouled and was arguably obstructed. In fact I'm surprised it wasn't awarded as the powers that be normally do their best to assist Real Madrid, as evidenced by the 5 minute delay to award City's first goal looking for a hand ball that very clearly wasn't there after looking at it for 10 seconds.
I'd have played that one on, but I guess it's easy enough when you're sat watching TV!
 






stewart12

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2019
2,096
Was it Reading away that we got one for the keeper picking up a back pass, the keeper threw the ball in anger, our player grabbed it and took the kick before Reading realised what was going on and we scored?
Yes I was just about to post this

It was Brooker and Zamora linking up
 


timbha

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,771
Sussex
So we get one of these, centrally, 8 yards out. The opposition are massed on the goal line. Who do you want taking the shot? Welbeck? Dunk? Lamptey?
I think we would try and keep possession by passing it back to Dunk, to Van Hecke on the half way line and if put under pressure back to Bart. Great for possession stats 🤣

Ps - about time refs started penalising keepers for time wasting with an indirect free kick
 


southstandandy

WEST STAND ANDY
Jul 9, 2003
6,276
I saw one last season on the EFL round up. Can't remember who it was against but the goal keeper was penalised for holding on to the ball for more than the 6 seconds permitted. Indirect free-kick which was blasted by the attacking team straight into the wall if I remember rightly.

Why don't they enact this rule more often?
 


Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
9,315
Or why not just scrap penalties altogether and award direct free kicks from wherever the offence has taken place?
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
54,525
Goldstone
So we get one of these, centrally, 8 yards out. The opposition are massed on the goal line. Who do you want taking the shot? Welbeck? Dunk? Lamptey?

Well it's not as important who takes it as whom they pass it to (you can't score directly from an indirect free kick).

A short lay-off to Welbeck to knock it in the roof of the net.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here