Yeh, It often makes more sense for the loanee club to play the player that is there for the longer term unless you have a very good reason not to
.............but many on the Hull fans' forum questioning why they've taken him.
I think I’d rather see durty suffer some more ta very much
That'll be nice for them to take a player who nobody has ever heard of, and turn him single handedly into a superstar, and then get upset when we ask for him to come back.
So, Spurs?
Wolves are probably satisfied with Jose Sa’s services - Ipswich with Walton’s too - and I expect Ramsdale will be back at Soton sooner rather than later.So, Spurs?
Jokes aside Leeds are basically lower level PL anyway. Leicester could use a keeper with Hermansen’s injury but they can’t take a second Brighton player on loan.
Lower PL level or not, they are playing against Championship teams - Rushworth has done that in spades already.So, Spurs?
Jokes aside Leeds are basically lower level PL anyway. Leicester could use a keeper with Hermansen’s injury but they can’t take a second Brighton player on loan.
Leicester are desperate for a better GK - and RVN doesn't fancy Buonanotte, so recall him and loan him somewhere else (or keep him here).So, Spurs?
Jokes aside Leeds are basically lower level PL anyway. Leicester could use a keeper with Hermansen’s injury but they can’t take a second Brighton player on loan.
Fair point, yes - but playing in the PL would still be the ideal (we wouldn't send him to be a number 2 anyway)
