Blues Guitarist
Well-known member
Why not a foul on Bart, he was pushed before the pen.
First one his studs take the ball. Second one is football and min contact.Blatant fouls, both should have been pens
First one definitely wasn't a blatant foul, second one arguably was, but a harsh one IMO.Blatant fouls, both should have been pens
Aside from the fact that it totally follows the rules there was no Malice from Joao Pedro, I wish these weren't penalties.Such a bad decision to give that as penalty
Well any palace fan would say that.Blatant fouls, both should have been pens
Hardly. That's just incredibly unlucky.Rubbish from us again. Giving away stupid penalty.
Barely any contact at all. You would be upset that being a foul in basketball!I genuinely don't understand how anyone thinks that is not a penalty. Pedro doesn't get the ball and volleys the attacker in the foot.
Really? Disagree with someone and they're a Palace fan? are you 5?Well any palace fan would say that.
This is ALWAYS the point for me with VAR. How can they say it's a clear error when they are not even sure after looking at it for ages?5 mins of everyone looking at it. HTF can that be a clear and obvious error
You said something ridiculous so I reserve the right to reply in kind.Really? Disagree with someone and they're a Palace fan? are you 5?
Hes(no gap)Goal is working.
Bollocks. That was very harsh.
WTF. No way a penalty. Cheating b stards
Absolute joke
5 mins of everyone looking at it. HTF can that be a clear and obvious error
Laughable penalty.
Absolute f***ing farce. Never a penalty but the ref wanted that bad.
HmmmmBlatant fouls, both should have been pens
He f***ing kicks the guy, how is that not a foul?You said something ridiculous so I reserve the right to reply in kind.