[Football] Mudryk and his 8.5 years

jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage

NSC Patron

Oct 17, 2008

15,019

• Dec 17, 2024

• #141

Birdie Boy said:

There was a player in Italy that was suited by the club for the transfer fee. Ex Chelsea? I think they won a well.

Click to expand...

There was Adrian Mutu?

 

Washie

Well-known member

Jun 20, 2011

6,135

Eastbourne

• Dec 17, 2024

• #142

Solid at the back said:

This might be a blessing in disguise unfortunately for Chelsea, surely if he's been found positive for a banned substance they can tear the contract up?

Click to expand...

No due to the amortisation of his fee. They would need to recoup some back.

 

B

Brian Munich

teH lulZ

Jul 7, 2008

321

• Dec 17, 2024

• #143

Birdie Boy said:

There was a player in Italy that was suited by the club for the transfer fee. Ex Chelsea? I think they won a well.

Click to expand...

That would presumably have been a player that failed a drug test before he was signed? The article says that the test was taken in August, so Chelsea can hardly sue Shaktar given that the transfer was done 18 months previously.

 

schmunk

Why oh why oh why?

Jan 19, 2018

10,482

Mid mid mid Sussex

• Dec 17, 2024

• #144

Washie said:

No due to the amortisation of his fee. They would need to recoup some back.

Click to expand...

Surely they have another couple of hotels to sell to themselves, to offset that.

 

Washie

Well-known member

Jun 20, 2011

6,135

Eastbourne

• Dec 17, 2024

• #145

Brian Munich said:

That would presumably have been a player that failed a drug test before he was signed? The article says that the test was taken in August, so Chelsea can hardly sue Shaktar given that the transfer was done 18 months previously.

Click to expand...

No, they sued Mutu for £14.3m

 

B

Brian Munich

teH lulZ

Jul 7, 2008

321

• Dec 17, 2024

• #146

Washie said:

No, they sued Mutu for £14.3m

Click to expand...

Ah ok. Well they aren't going to be able to sue Mudryk for his transfer fee. Whilst he's undoubtedly very rich; he won't be worth 70m.

 

jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage

NSC Patron

Oct 17, 2008

15,019

• Dec 17, 2024

• #147

Washie said:

No, they sued Mutu for £14.3m

Click to expand...

And won, and never saw a penny of it back apparently.

 

Birdie Boy

Well-known member

Jun 17, 2011

4,448

• Dec 17, 2024

• #148

Brian Munich said:

That would presumably have been a player that failed a drug test before he was signed? The article says that the test was taken in August, so Chelsea can hardly sue Shaktar given that the transfer was done 18 months previously.

Click to expand...

No the club sued the player not the previous club.

 

S

Springal

Well-known member

Feb 12, 2005

24,815

GOSBTS

• Wednesday at 7:36 AM

• #149

Has he won the Balon D’or yet as claimed by Roberto ?