I’ll apologise now if my thoughts on this annoy or upset anyone.
Having served at a time when it was illegal to be in the Forces and be gay, I am torn with the Government’s announcement that they will be paying compensation to anyone who was kicked out for their sexuality.
While I think that there was some awful treatment meted out to gay people in the Services, I also know of at least 2 cases where homosexuality was used as a kind of ‘get out of jail free’ card by lads who desperately wanted to leave, but were unable to due to length of service etc.
I also know of a very unfair case of a senior non- commissioned officer being stripped of his rank, and pension, and dismissed as services no longer required. This is one up from a dishonourable discharge. This was after 20+ years service.
There was never a whiff of scandal about him, a thoroughly decent, very competent rating, popular with everyone who knew him. I still remember the shock on being told he was being thrown out, and the reason for it, and I was far from being the only one.
In those days, when you joined up, more or less on your first day, you were asked if you were a homosexual, if you answered in the positive you were immediately sent home, before you signed on the dotted line. This practice was, I believe, still in force up until 2000, when the restrictions were lifted.
I really don’t know if I agree with a blanket compensation plan, I do think that each case should be individually assessed. Whether there is the will for this is a different matter.
I would just like to make clear, I completely agree with the policy regarding gay people in the Forces now. I was on a consultation process as far back as 1990, as a junior rating representative and spoke up for the liberalising of the policy enforced then.
Having served at a time when it was illegal to be in the Forces and be gay, I am torn with the Government’s announcement that they will be paying compensation to anyone who was kicked out for their sexuality.
While I think that there was some awful treatment meted out to gay people in the Services, I also know of at least 2 cases where homosexuality was used as a kind of ‘get out of jail free’ card by lads who desperately wanted to leave, but were unable to due to length of service etc.
I also know of a very unfair case of a senior non- commissioned officer being stripped of his rank, and pension, and dismissed as services no longer required. This is one up from a dishonourable discharge. This was after 20+ years service.
There was never a whiff of scandal about him, a thoroughly decent, very competent rating, popular with everyone who knew him. I still remember the shock on being told he was being thrown out, and the reason for it, and I was far from being the only one.
In those days, when you joined up, more or less on your first day, you were asked if you were a homosexual, if you answered in the positive you were immediately sent home, before you signed on the dotted line. This practice was, I believe, still in force up until 2000, when the restrictions were lifted.
I really don’t know if I agree with a blanket compensation plan, I do think that each case should be individually assessed. Whether there is the will for this is a different matter.
I would just like to make clear, I completely agree with the policy regarding gay people in the Forces now. I was on a consultation process as far back as 1990, as a junior rating representative and spoke up for the liberalising of the policy enforced then.