Puzzle #504
14 guesses
3m 45s
alphaguess.com
14 guesses
3m 45s
alphaguess.com
Good speed for 17 guessesPuzzle #504
17 guesses
1m 31s
alphaguess.com
I was just going to ask based on @drew 's effort whether people thought speed or guess accuracy was better? As a wordler it's always number of guesses for me. I'm much happier with a three that takes an hour than a six that takes five minutes because only one letter needed changing but there were loads of options for it. I play this the same way, trying to think of a correct word rather than hammering in random words quickly. I suspect others have words come to them quite easily and are happy to play fast.I can't believe no-one's started a table/league yet! But what would it be based on – time or number of guesses?
Easy 3-4 letter words make it very quick to narrow it down before thinking of what it might actually be. Start with something like mid then things like left, back, keep, goal, net, post, hit, off, red, and so on.Good speed for 17 guesses
I don't get too hung up on speed, just using shorter words to narrow down the choices, probably like many, I start with the same word from the middle of the alphabet, ie beginning with M. Then 3 letter words to narrow it down before it get's harder. Unlike Wordle, if you get this in 3 you've been incredibly lucky rather than skillful. Wordle certainly deserves more time.I was just going to ask based on @drew 's effort whether people thought speed or guess accuracy was better? As a wordler it's always number of guesses for me. I'm much happier with a three that takes an hour than a six that takes five minutes because only one letter needed changing but there were loads of options for it. I play this the same way, trying to think of a correct word rather than hammering in random words quickly. I suspect others have words come to them quite easily and are happy to play fast.
Good game though @Professor Plum
Long answer, sorry.I was just going to ask based on @drew 's effort whether people thought speed or guess accuracy was better? As a wordler it's always number of guesses for me. I'm much happier with a three that takes an hour than a six that takes five minutes because only one letter needed changing but there were loads of options for it. I play this the same way, trying to think of a correct word rather than hammering in random words quickly. I suspect others have words come to them quite easily and are happy to play fast.
Good game though @Professor Plum
Thanks for the reply PP – and apologies for missing that something along what I asked had been done before. I play the game, but don't post results – or therefore look – on this thread very often. My suggestion was only half in jest because it would be a stats nerd's wet dream with all the numbers and ranking possibilities, but very much a ballache to collate it all I would image (I don't know – I'm very much a words man, not numbers).Long answer, sorry.
I asked this very question here a week or so back — guesses or speed? I don’t think anyone responded at the time. You can make an argument for both but my feeling is that speed is probably a better yardstick of skill. Hard to explain but if you decide that time taken doesn’t matter so much there’s still a lot of guesses available and just thinking for longer doesn’t seem to lead to a significantly better chance of guessing the right word. So you could decide to guess a word only once every 5 minutes but is that likely to result in a lower-guess solution than guessing just once a minute?! I don’t think so. You get closer to the right word by guessing a number of other words first and all of these are pretty arbitrary punts until you really home in on the last few realistic possibilities. So speed seems to be the key to me.
Though if you were to attempt some sort of league table then guesses priority would be more practical as guesses would be much easier to tot up and put in order.
To answer Brother @Greg Bobkin, yes I’ve thought about proposing a league table but doesn’t this then take some of the innocent fun out of it? The admin gets a bit cumbersome too. There are some days I don’t do it because I’m too busy or I just forget. Someone would have to commit to collating results every day.
What do people think? Maybe a better idea would be a one-off knockout or tournament rather than trying to maintain an ongoing league.
In general I think Alphaguess is more geared towards here-today-gone-tomorrow temporary fun than is Wordle for instance. With Wordle there’s an archive of solutions and stats available on how you’ve done over a period. It seems more geared towards competition and record keeping. With AG you can’t go back and check your scores or the words that have come up.
But if there was a demand, we could perhaps have a tournament of some kind after Christmas? I don’t think pre-Christmas is very practical. Thoughts welcome.