oldboyroy
Well-known member
They are adamant on TS commentary that it was a stonewall pen irrespective of whether he was able to get to the ballNever a penalty. Wilson was never close to getting the ball
They are adamant on TS commentary that it was a stonewall pen irrespective of whether he was able to get to the ballNever a penalty. Wilson was never close to getting the ball
It was 50/50 but in no way was it clear and obvious. Very subjective call imo. Correct to not to overturn the on field decisionThey are adamant on TS commentary that it was a stonewall pen?
If there were no West Ham players near him the ball would still have flown way over his head.They are adamant on TS commentary that it was a stonewall pen?
With that amount of contact every corner would result in a penalty.It was 50/50 but in no way was it clear and obvious. Very subjective call imo. Correct to not to overturn the on field decision
Have they looked down the back of the sofa?In fairness to the bar codes, they have lost there 3 best defenders
In fairness to the bar codes, they have lost there 3 best defenders
Out of interest, where in the laws of the game does it state that you have to be able to get the ball to be a victim of a foul?Never a penalty. Wilson was never close to getting the ball