Dave the hatosaurus
Well-known member
wise words indeed.
The thread title says "if dunk is fit" to which my answer would be yes he starts. I trust the correct decision will be made and based on training/medical reports.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] If Dunk is fit, would you start him?
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
The thread title says "if dunk is fit" to which my answer would be yes he starts. I trust the correct decision will be made and based on training/medical reports.
Iggle Piggle
Well-known member
- Sep 3, 2010
- 5,948
Igor at LB is an absolute no no for me. He isn't mobile enough and gets football vertigo when he goes over the halfway line. I'd imagine he's at best 4th choice given we've had Pervis, Ferdi and Hinsh play there so far this season in any case. I also think Mitoma drops off massively when Igor is at LB as the overlapping runs aren't there to create chaos.
He has, however, been very very good at CB. I'd keep him there tomorrow. Dunk only just back and a bit unfair to drop him after the city game where I thought he had a good game (albeit viewed on a Spanish telly)
swindonseagull
Well-known member
Dunk is getting slower and is prone to make mistakes he needs to earn a recall.
JPVH and Igor can’t be dropped ATM
JPVH and Igor can’t be dropped ATM
Last edited:
Cowfold Seagull
Fan of the 17 bus
To my mind "phasing him out now" would be akin to madness.
Milano
Well-known member
I don't think you 'give minutes' to a CB; you start or you replace an injured player or a player having a mare. Apart from the odd set piece our CBs only play in our half, not like midfielders (or even the front 3) who cover huge distances and need rotating in game. The position is too important to change a CB out with 15 to go. Unless of course we're 3-0 up/down at that point.
If Dunk is 'fully' fit I suspect he starts. But IMO we'll see him start next Friday.
If Dunk is 'fully' fit I suspect he starts. But IMO we'll see him start next Friday.
Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 7,365
We'll need everyone over the season and I'd be confident in all of them, but for me, if everyone is completely fit and there's no other factors, Dunk is still the first name on the team sheet. Yes, defending, leadership, organisation, range of passing, threat from set pieces, but actually for this alone:
Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 7,365
ten Haag did. Thanks for the points Erik.
bluenitsuj
Listen to me!!!
Not heard this question before 
The options were straight back in or don't change.Abso-bloody-lutely. I am shocked - SHOCKED - by the result of this poll..
Two-thirds of you would drop our captain and greatest ever player just because he got a minor calf strain a few weeks ago.
I am staggered by you lot
I voted for the latter simply because i think he'll be better (on this occasion) to come on as a second half sub, to me (on this occasion) straight back in isnt the right thing to do.
But I'm no expert.
I voted no, but reading the thread ive changed my mind. Given the weather forecast, i think we need our hardest team, not the silkiest. In that scenario, Dunk is the first name down. Move igor to fullback and tell weiffer he can have the weekend off.
US Seagull
Well-known member
A lot of people seem to want to argue against the premise of the question by saying that they don't expect Dunk to be fit enough for tomorrow. But the premise of the question is if fit. So arguments claiming that he isn't, while probably true, isn't answering the question.
No need to rush Dunk back in, no changes
Poskettspurpose
Active member
- Jun 18, 2021
- 83
I could be wrong, but I feel now is the time to start making the break. It will take time but it has to start somewhere.....
Yes.
The team lacks leadership, see Wolves and Liverpool.
I might have voted differently if Milner was fit.
The team lacks leadership, see Wolves and Liverpool.
I might have voted differently if Milner was fit.
- Oct 17, 2008
- 14,481
Yes.
- Jun 20, 2021
- 3,865
Shame there was no one to lead us when we were losing to Man City, otherwise we might have been able to get a point from that game.
Wardy's twin
Well-known member
- Oct 21, 2014
- 8,866
No, a) it sends the wrong message about merit b) he is not fully match fit c) he is prone to more injury and has been for the last 18 months let him recover properly. He will quite clearly get game time this season and possibly come on in last 20 minutes or so tomorrow.
Soton Seagull
Well-known member
Love Dunk, but ditching Igor after his most consistent spell for us would be brutal. Let's be honest, Van Hecke starts, so Igor would be the victim.
And Wolves?
Liverpool?