Matt sounded like Andy Murray,In his interview he didn’t sound very Scottish or Irish.
Matt sounded like Andy Murray,In his interview he didn’t sound very Scottish or Irish.
It's a fantastic interview. A very impressive player and person indeed.I'm sure this has been posted before - well worth alisten (roughly half an hour)
Matt O'Riley on the Albion podcast with Glenn and Paul Hayward
Very interesting chat about quality of mind and being in the present moment. Very exciting if the rest of the squad start start to adopt this kind of presence of mind.
Matt sounded like Andy Murray,
Embarrassing.Muscle memory apparently
Celtic fans 'greetin' at O'Riley's botched celebration as old habits kick in
The Denmark international was on top of the world at the final whistle and returned to his Parkhead rootswww.dailyrecord.co.uk
Happy to admit that until I read the report in the paper on Sunday that I had no idea he is Danish (with the emphasis on ish).Born in Hounslow. Chose to play for Denmark as his mother is Danish. Apparently he can speak reasonable Danish.
One of a constellation of stars. Amazing stuff....I think he's going to be a star for the Albion.
Pretty wild that this wasn't mentioned on the podcast.Happy to admit that until I read the report in the paper on Sunday that I had no idea he is Danish (with the emphasis on ish).
Putting this down to being footballed out after the Euros and paying very little attention to who we were signing.
Even wilder I haven't listened to a podcast in about 4 years.Pretty wild that this wasn't mentioned on the podcast.
Spat coffeePosh spice is a slapper
She thinks she’s effing kylie
When she’s shagging beckham
She thinks of Matt O’Riley !
(Well, someone had to do it !)
Posh spice is a slapper
She thinks she’s effing kylie
When she’s shagging beckham
He thinks of Matt O’Riley !
(Well, someone had to do it !)
My take is no. I feel that amortization, the Chelsea way, is little more than an accounting trick, whereas we clearly have a plan for how each player will develop over the length of their contract, from going out on loan or playing with the U21s to being part of the first team to leaving for a decent fee, in some cases after agreeing an extension. By contrast, Chelsea seem prepared to offload some relatively recent acquisitions, such as David Datro Fofana and reportedly even KDH. Sure, we binned Dahoud after one season, but that was quite unusual for us and unlike the Chelsea signings in question, he arrived on a free.I saw a comment on another thread (Kiernan DH) about the long contacts dished out by Chelsea. It wasn't long ago that we would have regarded Matt's five year deal as a very long contract. Have we moved in the same direction as Chelsea by amortising deals over longer time periods?
Nice summary. I tend to agree that the driver for the longer contracts is coming from a different place.My take is no. I feel that amortization, the Chelsea way, is little more than an accounting trick, whereas we clearly have a plan for how each player will develop over the length of their contract, from going out on loan or playing with the U21s to being part of the first team to leaving for a decent fee, in some cases after agreeing an extension. By contrast, Chelsea seem prepared to offload some relatively recent acquisitions, such as David Datro Fofana and reportedly even KDH. Sure, we binned Dahoud after one season, but that was quite unusual for us and unlike the Chelsea signings in question, he arrived on a free.
tl;dr Both clubs favor lengthy contracts so as to protect player value but we seem to have a plan for each player's development whereas Chelsea don't and so end up keen to sell players who have only recently joined.