[Football] Where did Wolverhampton rank in the worst sides to 'grace' the Amex?

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

Were Wolverhampton the worst side in PL to come to the Amex?

  • The worst

  • One of the worst

Results are only viewable after voting.


crodonilson

crodonilson

He/Him
Jan 17, 2005
14,062
Lyme Regis
Still absolutely fuming from yesterday, a game there to be won, and won handsomely if we got out of first gear but still for the late antics would have been a comfortable 3 points.

I was staggered at how poor and limited the opposition were as an established EPL side and couldn't think of a worse side we have played since getting promoted. For me they could get close to Derbys 11 points and are currently on course for a meagre 8 points all season.
 














Washie

Washie

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
6,052
Eastbourne
WhingForPresident said:
With the caveat I've seen it's a crodo thread..

They were dogshit, bordering on embarrassing in the first half, then we decided to just hand over control to them in the second. I'd say they deserved a point. Not because they fought their way back into it, because we sat back and let them play.
Click to expand...
Spurs and Newcastle aid the same about us.
 


Weststander

Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,253
Withdean area
They played really well from 55 minutes, far superior to us at everything. Almost taking the p1ss, their 9 and 10 had opportunities at 1-0.

Way better than what I saw from Forest and Ipswich for example.

We seemed frozen, unable to go up a gear and this was BEFORE the subs. We needed a 25 year old StevieG type player in centre midfield to drive us forward, make direct runs, push play forward 30 yards, give Wolves something to worry about.

Sadly we went into our shells.
 






crodonilson

crodonilson

He/Him
Jan 17, 2005
14,062
Lyme Regis
WhingForPresident said:
With the caveat I've seen it's a crodo thread..

They were dogshit, bordering on embarrassing in the first half, then we decided to just hand over control to them in the second. I'd say they deserved a point. Not because they fought their way back into it, because we sat back and let them play.
Click to expand...
I'm with you and that's why I was so disappointed, first half was total control without getting out of 2nd gear, they were so limited and we were still the better side in the 2nd half but sat back and offered them territory and possession.
 


Questions

Questions

Habitual User
Oct 18, 2006
25,504
Worthing
Weststander said:
They played really well from 55 minutes, far superior to us at everything. Almost taking the p1ss, their 9 and 10 had opportunities at 1-0.

Way better than what I saw from Forest and Ipswich for example.

We seemed frozen, unable to go up a gear and this was BEFORE the subs. We needed a 25 year old StevieG type player in centre midfield to drive us forward, make direct runs, push play forward 30 yards, give Wolves something to worry about.

Sadly we went into our shells.
Click to expand...
O’Reilly.
 


BRIGHT ON Q

BRIGHT ON Q

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
9,248
No where near the worst, I can think of Burnley x 3 for a start
 




Deadly Danson

Deadly Danson

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Oct 22, 2003
4,602
Brighton
Mustafa II said:
Thought they were decent, and far better than their league position suggests.

Defended well in the first half, and looked decent enough in the 2nd. They have a decent squad.
Click to expand...
Very much this. People have been saying how awful they are but they gave City a good game, have a decent coach but a limited squad and, on their second half performance deserved their draw. That said I am getting very bored with teams coming to the Amex and just getting 11 mem behind the ball.
 


Mustafa II

Mustafa II

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2022
1,819
Hove
Deadly Danson said:
Very much this. People have been saying how awful they are but they gave City a good game, have a decent coach but a limited squad and, on their second half performance deserved their draw. That said I am getting very bored with teams coming to the Amex and just getting 11 men behind the ball.
Click to expand...

This bit we need to get used to, as a potential top 6 team.

Since we've been 'good' over the last few years, it's how the lower teams set up to play against us. They play the same way against all top 6 sides as it's the most effective way to grind a result. We're obviously not as good as the like of City and Arsenal, which is why our record against the bottom sides is poor.

It's our job to break them down... and to be fair we are getting a lot better at it, compared to previous seasons. Should have finished them off yesterday, but it was just one of those days.
 


Jeremiah

Jeremiah

John 14 : 6
Mar 15, 2020
2,520
Hove
Don't think it's fair to say they are the worse side to grace the Amex but they are the most frequent visitors with 12 appearances here.

If not for Verbruggen's excellent positioning they could have won
 




W

Wardy's twin

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2014
8,866
they looked ok once they decided they didn't have to lay on the ground every 5 mins better finishing and they would have been 1-0 up.
 












One Teddy Maybank

One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
22,982
Worthing
El Turi said:
They weren’t that bad. Cunha was probably the second best player on the pitch (after Baleba).
Click to expand...
Really, thought Baleba was poor in the second half, got caught a number of times, almost trying too hard.
The sub was the right one, as he looked knackered.

The ineffectiveness of our midfield in the second half was one of the reasons they took control.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top