[Football] Which club has a squad with a market value worth more than Bayern Munich

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in


El Presidente

El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,016
Pattknull med Haksprut
…Juventus, Inter, AC Milan, Napoli, Villa, Borussia Dortmund and is the 11th most valuable in the world per the highly respected CIES Laboratories in Switzerland?

If you have a hat, DOFF it to TB, PBOBE and the rest of the grande fromages at the Albion.



















IMG_2858.jpeg
 














hans kraay fan club

hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,769
Chandlers Ford
Nobby Cybergoat said:
I note you chose not to show the full list. Presumably to save the face of CPFC2010 who i'll guess are currently nestled between Trabzonspor and Ross County
Click to expand...

Uh_huh_him said:
Do they go down far enough to register Palace's value??
Click to expand...
The last on the list shown, is valued at €530.

WORLD CLASS defender Marc Geuhi, and GENERATIONAL TALENT Adam Wharton alone, are worth close to that. Some mistake here, obviously.
 




S

Safe.

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2008
2,291
I'd like to see the average age of the squads. I feel part of the value of some of the players being so high is because we have some really young players.
 




Beanstalk

Beanstalk

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2017
3,031
London
Uh_huh_him said:
Interesting that Leverkuesen have so few squad players at such a high average value.
Click to expand...
Imagine that Wirtz, Frimpong and Boniface make up at least a quarter of that on their own. All under 23, all look like they'll probably spend the majority of their careers chasing Champions League trophies. Damn UEFA and their flimsy transfer rules.
 




S

Seagull on the Hill

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2022
758
Do I have to be the first to say "fixtures" and refer the honourable gentleman to post 721 on the Newcastle v Brighton match thread ?
 














dwayne

dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
16,269
London
schmunk said:
But comparing starting lineup costs, as I did in the other thread, it's of course bollocks...
Click to expand...
Yep but I think this proves we have a ridiculously strong bench now, possibly top 6 quality. For example with a fully fit squad I think our bench is better than Newcastles.
 


F

FCB

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2023
287
Number of players they've included for each club is a bit unclear to me.

Ofc can't comment on other clubs I don't know good enough but we have 23 registered first team players (according to La Liga rules can only register numbers 1-25 for first team), three Barca Atletic players who have played minutes for the first team and four players out on loan. Then there were additional 5-6 players who were called up to fill the first team bench when we had injuries but didn't play. So probably closer to 35 than 40 players.

But shouldn't then they also include all of Barca Atletic (B team) players under contract (by my count 24 players) who also have some market value? So overall number should be closer to 50 players in that case including loanees.

And for PL clubs they've also not included all of the players in U21 or U18 teams but maybe some of them? So what is the exact criteria? Would be useful if we could get a full list of players whose values they've calculated/used but I could only found the highest valued player by each team.

Not that it's really important, I'm just nitpicky.
 


GT49er

GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,188
Gloucester
Shit - I don't like the feel of this at all. My club, chronically underperforming. Doesn't feel right - with these players we should be qualifying for the CL ever year and winning trophies.

Barber out.
 




M

Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
17,780
Fiveways
FCB said:
Number of players they've included for each club is a bit unclear to me.

Ofc can't comment on other clubs I don't know good enough but we have 23 registered first team players (according to La Liga rules can only register numbers 1-25 for first team), three Barca Atletic players who have played minutes for the first team and four players out on loan. Then there were additional 5-6 players who were called up to fill the first team bench when we had injuries but didn't play. So probably closer to 35 than 40 players.

But shouldn't then they also include all of Barca Atletic (B team) players under contract (by my count 24 players) who also have some market value? So overall number should be closer to 50 players in that case including loanees.

And for PL clubs they've also not included all of the players in U21 or U18 teams but maybe some of them? So what is the exact criteria? Would be useful if we could get a full list of players whose values they've calculated/used but I could only found the highest valued player by each team.

Not that it's really important, I'm just nitpicky.
Click to expand...
How do you view Barca's current position and future trajectory. I'm sure you'll mention the differences between PL and Liga spending and regulations but from the little I know your academy is filling the transfer downturn.
Also why are you so regularly linked with players that are due to be sold at extremely high prices? Is that lazy clickbait that's operating on your past and reputation rather than recent transfer activity?
 




You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top