[Football] Which club has a squad with a market value worth more than Bayern Munich

El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,951

Pattknull med Haksprut

• Monday at 11:21 AM

• #1

…Juventus, Inter, AC Milan, Napoli, Villa, Borussia Dortmund and is the 11th most valuable in the world per the highly respected CIES Laboratories in Switzerland?

If you have a hat, DOFF it to TB, PBOBE and the rest of the grande fromages at the Albion.

 

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member

Sep 28, 2011

11,954

• Monday at 11:29 AM

• #2

Interesting that Leverkuesen have so few squad players at such a high average value.

 

Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member

Jul 19, 2021

8,593

• Monday at 11:31 AM

• #3

I note you chose not to show the full list. Presumably to save the face of CPFC2010 who i'll guess are currently nestled between Trabzonspor and Ross County

 

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member

Sep 28, 2011

11,954

• Monday at 11:32 AM

• #4

Do they go down far enough to register Palace's value??

 

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member

Sep 28, 2011

11,954

• Monday at 11:43 AM

• #5

found it

 

hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.

Helpful Moderator

Mar 16, 2005

62,629

Chandlers Ford

• Monday at 11:44 AM

• #6

Nobby Cybergoat said:

I note you chose not to show the full list. Presumably to save the face of CPFC2010 who i'll guess are currently nestled between Trabzonspor and Ross County

Click to expand...

Uh_huh_him said:

Do they go down far enough to register Palace's value??

Click to expand...

The last on the list shown, is valued at €530.

WORLD CLASS defender Marc Geuhi, and GENERATIONAL TALENT Adam Wharton alone, are worth close to that. Some mistake here, obviously.

 

GrizzlingGammon

Well-known member

Dec 15, 2018

1,958

• Monday at 11:46 AM

• #7

Does this mean finishing under 7th this season will be a failure?

 

S

Safe.

Well-known member

Jun 8, 2008

2,286

• Monday at 11:49 AM

• #8

I'd like to see the average age of the squads. I feel part of the value of some of the players being so high is because we have some really young players.

 

Beanstalk

Well-known member

Apr 5, 2017

2,982

London

• Monday at 11:50 AM

• #9

Uh_huh_him said:

Interesting that Leverkuesen have so few squad players at such a high average value.

Click to expand...

Imagine that Wirtz, Frimpong and Boniface make up at least a quarter of that on their own. All under 23, all look like they'll probably spend the majority of their careers chasing Champions League trophies. Damn UEFA and their flimsy transfer rules.

 

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member

Sep 28, 2011

11,954

• Monday at 11:52 AM

• #10

GrizzlingGammon said:

Does this mean finishing under 7th this season will be a failure?

Click to expand...

Suspect our 48 players is pushing us further up the total value table.

Average player value may be a better indicator of where we should be targetting:

 

S

Seagull on the Hill

Well-known member

Jan 22, 2022

721

• Monday at 11:56 AM

• #11

Do I have to be the first to say "fixtures" and refer the honourable gentleman to post 721 on the Newcastle v Brighton match thread ?

 

W

Wes Tupper

Active member

Feb 27, 2024

95

• Monday at 12:01 PM

• #12

Uh_huh_him said:

Do they go down far enough to register Palace's value??

Click to expand...

I think you’ll find them on the “Let’s count to a million” thread.

 

B-right-on

Living the dream

Apr 23, 2015

6,678

Shoreham Beaaaach

• Monday at 12:11 PM

• #13

Transfer values of players owned: Real at the top - CIES Football Observatory

The 475th CIES Football Observatory Weekly Post presents the 100 clubs worldwide whose footballers under contract have the highest aggregate (...)

football-observatory.com

The full list is an interesting read

 

Comrade Sam

Comrade Sam

Jan 31, 2013

1,885

Walthamstow

• Monday at 12:12 PM

• #14

Yesterday some Geordies were using this to explain why their defeat was nothing to be ashamed of.

 

schmunk

VAR is a net positive

Jan 19, 2018

10,252

Mid mid mid Sussex

• Monday at 1:27 PM

• #15

Comrade Sam said:

Yesterday some Geordies were using this to explain why their defeat was nothing to be ashamed of.

Click to expand...

But comparing starting lineup costs, as I did in the other thread, it's of course bollocks...

 

dwayne

Well-known member

Jul 5, 2003

16,109

London

• Monday at 2:44 PM

• #16

schmunk said:

But comparing starting lineup costs, as I did in the other thread, it's of course bollocks...

Click to expand...

Yep but I think this proves we have a ridiculously strong bench now, possibly top 6 quality. For example with a fully fit squad I think our bench is better than Newcastles.

 

F

FCB

Well-known member

Sep 1, 2023

249

• Yesterday at 2:28 PM

• #17

Number of players they've included for each club is a bit unclear to me.

Ofc can't comment on other clubs I don't know good enough but we have 23 registered first team players (according to La Liga rules can only register numbers 1-25 for first team), three Barca Atletic players who have played minutes for the first team and four players out on loan. Then there were additional 5-6 players who were called up to fill the first team bench when we had injuries but didn't play. So probably closer to 35 than 40 players.

But shouldn't then they also include all of Barca Atletic (B team) players under contract (by my count 24 players) who also have some market value? So overall number should be closer to 50 players in that case including loanees.

And for PL clubs they've also not included all of the players in U21 or U18 teams but maybe some of them? So what is the exact criteria? Would be useful if we could get a full list of players whose values they've calculated/used but I could only found the highest valued player by each team.

Not that it's really important, I'm just nitpicky.

 

GT49er

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Feb 1, 2009

48,838

Gloucester

• Yesterday at 2:35 PM

• #18

Shit - I don't like the feel of this at all. My club, chronically underperforming. Doesn't feel right - with these players we should be qualifying for the CL ever year and winning trophies.

Barber out.

 

M

Machiavelli

Well-known member

Oct 11, 2013

17,638

Fiveways

• Yesterday at 2:40 PM

• #19

FCB said:

Number of players they've included for each club is a bit unclear to me.

Ofc can't comment on other clubs I don't know good enough but we have 23 registered first team players (according to La Liga rules can only register numbers 1-25 for first team), three Barca Atletic players who have played minutes for the first team and four players out on loan. Then there were additional 5-6 players who were called up to fill the first team bench when we had injuries but didn't play. So probably closer to 35 than 40 players.

But shouldn't then they also include all of Barca Atletic (B team) players under contract (by my count 24 players) who also have some market value? So overall number should be closer to 50 players in that case including loanees.

And for PL clubs they've also not included all of the players in U21 or U18 teams but maybe some of them? So what is the exact criteria? Would be useful if we could get a full list of players whose values they've calculated/used but I could only found the highest valued player by each team.

Not that it's really important, I'm just nitpicky.

Click to expand...

How do you view Barca's current position and future trajectory. I'm sure you'll mention the differences between PL and Liga spending and regulations but from the little I know your academy is filling the transfer downturn.
Also why are you so regularly linked with players that are due to be sold at extremely high prices? Is that lazy clickbait that's operating on your past and reputation rather than recent transfer activity?