- Jul 27, 2024
- 631
Depends who you ask.Keeping 55% of what you’ve earned feels fair.
Depends who you ask.Keeping 55% of what you’ve earned feels fair.
Depends who you ask.
Few of us would disagree in first principles with tax avoidance. That's legal, and starts when you take out an ISA.IHT avoidance.
And second homes are subject to CGT. I saw a wealthy individual pass his second home to his son. HMRC caught him out after noting it from Land Registry data. CGT bill and penalties.
Few of us would disagree in first principles with tax avoidance. That's legal, and starts when you take out an ISA.
What this bloke was doing was tax evasion, which is illegal, and changing the law to tax beneficiaries rather than testators on death would not make any difference to this particular fraud. It would still be illegal and he would presumably still have done it.
Gifting your home is fine and legit and if done more than seven years before death can remove it from the estate. Their is a big but however, if you carry on living in that home you must pay a commercial rent to the new owner which is taxable to them as income. If rent isn’t paid the gifting is ignored and the house is back in the estate.Avoidance used to be a wholly clean or accepted term. Less so in society and in law now eg the DOTAS regime. The abuse went too far, both Labour and Tory governments had enough.
IHT avoidance. I’ve seen elderly parents swapping homes with the next gen (the older couple leaving a valuable place), an elderly woman gifting her £600k home to her great niece. I’m not a solicitor. When it comes to a death 4, 5 or 10 years later are these on the radar or questions of an estates solicitor, on the form?
IHT avoidance. I’ve seen elderly parents swapping homes with the next gen (the older couple leaving a valuable place), an elderly woman gifting her £600k home to her great niece. I’m not a solicitor. When it comes to a death 4, 5 or 10 years later are these on the radar or questions of an estates solicitor, on the form?
Would have to ask the questions about commercial rent/bills etc to ensure the gift fell within the 7 year rule.If someone gifts their £600k home, 7 years or more before death, why would it be on the form or on the solicitor's radar?
L&G made this option to me quite prominently in their literature and it makes total sense, giving the survivor total control of the funds relatively quick as wellI don’t think expert advice is required with the life assurance issues mentioned above.
Simply ask the life company for the form to put the life assurance policy in trust. Their forms are incredibly simple.
In practical terms, following death the payout is made fairly swiftly directly to the stated beneficiary. Tax-free and not part of the estate.
Exactly, you have to at least present an argument that the sale was at arms length if you plan to continue living there.Gifting your home is fine and legit and if done more than seven years before death can remove it from the estate. Their is a big but however, if you carry on living in that home you must pay a commercial rent to the new owner which is taxable to them as income. If rent isn’t paid the gifting is ignored and the house is back in the estate.
There are gonna be changes and more will pay IHT.
Even less pay IHT than go to private school but I expect a lot of bedwetting if it happens
Inheritance tax increases expected for some in Budget
It is not known how many people are likely to end up paying more under the government's plan.www.bbc.co.uk
Is that £750k per person or per couple? Or as it is now where on death person A can pass their allowance to person B.My view is a straight £750k threshold and do away with almost all the other reliefs. But keep Agricultural Property Relief and genuine Business Property Relief for economic and expertise stability reasons. So ending a range of copouts and the effective £1m threshold.
But it won’t be a game changer. The biggest thing is gifts made throughout a life. People worth £3m, £30m, £300m don’t pay IHT. Assets pass to kids and grandkids many years before eg cash. How to crack that? A supercomputer monitoring the worldwide assets of 68m folk throughout their lives is a non starter.
I'm also struggling to see how they can effectively administer/collect taking into account gifts made and the 7 year rule etc however they fiddle with it.My view is a straight £750k threshold and do away with almost all the other reliefs. But keep Agricultural Property Relief and genuine Business Property Relief for economic and expertise stability reasons. So ending a range of copouts and the effective £1m threshold.
But it won’t be a game changer. The biggest thing is gifts made throughout a life. People worth £3m, £30m, £300m don’t pay IHT. Assets pass to kids and grandkids many years before eg cash. How to crack that? A supercomputer monitoring the worldwide assets of 68m folk throughout their lives is a non starter.
I understand that, currently, the Executor has the responsibility to identify any gifts within the last seven years. That's why it's important for all gifts to be documented, with details left with the Will.I'm also struggling to see how they can effectively administer/collect taking into account gifts made and the 7 year rule etc however they fiddle with it.
This cabal really know how to motivate folks to do well and save a few quid.There are gonna be changes and more will pay IHT.
Even less pay IHT than go to private school but I expect a lot of bedwetting if it happens
Inheritance tax increases expected for some in Budget
It is not known how many people are likely to end up paying more under the government's plan.www.bbc.co.uk
But it won’t be a game changer. The biggest thing is gifts made throughout a life. People worth £3m, £30m, £300m don’t pay IHT. Assets pass to kids and grandkids many years before eg cash. How to crack that? A supercomputer monitoring the worldwide assets of 68m folk throughout their lives is a non starter.