Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Inheritance Tax









dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,519
IHT avoidance.

And second homes are subject to CGT. I saw a wealthy individual pass his second home to his son. HMRC caught him out after noting it from Land Registry data. CGT bill and penalties.
Few of us would disagree in first principles with tax avoidance. That's legal, and starts when you take out an ISA.

What this bloke was doing was tax evasion, which is illegal, and changing the law to tax beneficiaries rather than testators on death would not make any difference to this particular fraud. It would still be illegal and he would presumably still have done it.
 


Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
68,468
Withdean area
Few of us would disagree in first principles with tax avoidance. That's legal, and starts when you take out an ISA.

What this bloke was doing was tax evasion, which is illegal, and changing the law to tax beneficiaries rather than testators on death would not make any difference to this particular fraud. It would still be illegal and he would presumably still have done it.

Avoidance used to be a wholly clean or accepted term. Less so in society and in law now eg the DOTAS regime. The abuse went too far, both Labour and Tory governments had enough.

IHT avoidance. I’ve seen elderly parents swapping homes with the next gen (the older couple leaving a valuable place), an elderly woman gifting her £600k home to her great niece. I’m not a solicitor. When it comes to a death 4, 5 or 10 years later are these on the radar or questions of an estates solicitor, on the form?
 


Driver8

On the road...
NSC Patron
Jul 31, 2005
16,172
North Wales
Avoidance used to be a wholly clean or accepted term. Less so in society and in law now eg the DOTAS regime. The abuse went too far, both Labour and Tory governments had enough.

IHT avoidance. I’ve seen elderly parents swapping homes with the next gen (the older couple leaving a valuable place), an elderly woman gifting her £600k home to her great niece. I’m not a solicitor. When it comes to a death 4, 5 or 10 years later are these on the radar or questions of an estates solicitor, on the form?
Gifting your home is fine and legit and if done more than seven years before death can remove it from the estate. Their is a big but however, if you carry on living in that home you must pay a commercial rent to the new owner which is taxable to them as income. If rent isn’t paid the gifting is ignored and the house is back in the estate.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
52,569
Goldstone
IHT avoidance. I’ve seen elderly parents swapping homes with the next gen (the older couple leaving a valuable place), an elderly woman gifting her £600k home to her great niece. I’m not a solicitor. When it comes to a death 4, 5 or 10 years later are these on the radar or questions of an estates solicitor, on the form?

If someone gifts their £600k home, 7 years or more before death, why would it be on the form or on the solicitor's radar?
 








Paulie Gualtieri

Bada Bing
NSC Patron
May 8, 2018
10,400
I don’t think expert advice is required with the life assurance issues mentioned above.

Simply ask the life company for the form to put the life assurance policy in trust. Their forms are incredibly simple.

In practical terms, following death the payout is made fairly swiftly directly to the stated beneficiary. Tax-free and not part of the estate.
L&G made this option to me quite prominently in their literature and it makes total sense, giving the survivor total control of the funds relatively quick as well
 


Paulie Gualtieri

Bada Bing
NSC Patron
May 8, 2018
10,400
Gifting your home is fine and legit and if done more than seven years before death can remove it from the estate. Their is a big but however, if you carry on living in that home you must pay a commercial rent to the new owner which is taxable to them as income. If rent isn’t paid the gifting is ignored and the house is back in the estate.
Exactly, you have to at least present an argument that the sale was at arms length if you plan to continue living there.
 






nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,345
Gods country fortnightly
There are gonna be changes and more will pay IHT.

Even less pay IHT than go to private school but I expect a lot of bedwetting if it happens

 


Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
68,468
Withdean area
There are gonna be changes and more will pay IHT.

Even less pay IHT than go to private school but I expect a lot of bedwetting if it happens


My view is a straight £750k threshold and do away with almost all the other reliefs. But keep Agricultural Property Relief and genuine Business Property Relief for economic and expertise stability reasons. So ending a range of copouts and the effective £1m threshold.

But it won’t be a game changer. The biggest thing is gifts made throughout a life. People worth £3m, £30m, £300m don’t pay IHT. Assets pass to kids and grandkids many years before eg cash. How to crack that? A supercomputer monitoring the worldwide assets of 68m folk throughout their lives is a non starter.
 


timbha

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,436
Sussex
My view is a straight £750k threshold and do away with almost all the other reliefs. But keep Agricultural Property Relief and genuine Business Property Relief for economic and expertise stability reasons. So ending a range of copouts and the effective £1m threshold.

But it won’t be a game changer. The biggest thing is gifts made throughout a life. People worth £3m, £30m, £300m don’t pay IHT. Assets pass to kids and grandkids many years before eg cash. How to crack that? A supercomputer monitoring the worldwide assets of 68m folk throughout their lives is a non starter.
Is that £750k per person or per couple? Or as it is now where on death person A can pass their allowance to person B.
It’s started to get complicated already! What if it’s just a property?
This and the euthanasia debate could make things messy!
 




dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,107
Burgess Hill
My view is a straight £750k threshold and do away with almost all the other reliefs. But keep Agricultural Property Relief and genuine Business Property Relief for economic and expertise stability reasons. So ending a range of copouts and the effective £1m threshold.

But it won’t be a game changer. The biggest thing is gifts made throughout a life. People worth £3m, £30m, £300m don’t pay IHT. Assets pass to kids and grandkids many years before eg cash. How to crack that? A supercomputer monitoring the worldwide assets of 68m folk throughout their lives is a non starter.
I'm also struggling to see how they can effectively administer/collect taking into account gifts made and the 7 year rule etc however they fiddle with it.

Think it's more likely to be reduction in the overall threshold on death (plus an increase in the rate perhaps) as this is easier to collect. It's more of a political statement than a fundraiser though.
 


sparkie

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
13,153
Hove
I'm a bit scared of this as my only route back to owning a property after losing everything a few years ago was via an inheritance. I hope Reeves leaves me enough to buy a studio flat.

Still, no point in worrying until the details of this Sword of Damocles doom are revealed.
 
Last edited:


CoolTed

Member
Nov 2, 2015
48
I'm also struggling to see how they can effectively administer/collect taking into account gifts made and the 7 year rule etc however they fiddle with it.
I understand that, currently, the Executor has the responsibility to identify any gifts within the last seven years. That's why it's important for all gifts to be documented, with details left with the Will.
 


Is it PotG?

Thrifty non-licker
Feb 20, 2017
25,136
Sussex by the Sea




BrightonCottager

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2013
2,641
Brighton
There was an article in Private Eye a few issues ago about the huge amounts of IHT avoided by rich people buying agricultural land as that is exempt from IHT, which has led to significant increases in land values.

It would seem more equitable to target active tax avoidance schemes like that before people (yes, me included if my mum's care home fees don't use it up first) whose parents bought their house decades ago.
 


RandyWanger

Je suis rôti de boeuf
Mar 14, 2013
6,564
Done a Frexit, now in London
But it won’t be a game changer. The biggest thing is gifts made throughout a life. People worth £3m, £30m, £300m don’t pay IHT. Assets pass to kids and grandkids many years before eg cash. How to crack that? A supercomputer monitoring the worldwide assets of 68m folk throughout their lives is a non starter.

Transactions via a distributed ledger on a blockchain no doubt. CBDC.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here