Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] 4 minutes added time
- Thread starter Giraffe
- Start date
Nobby Cybergoat
Well-known member
- Jul 19, 2021
- 8,754
It should have been more, of course.
But Spurs hadn;t threatened seriously for the second half. They weren't hammering at our door that hard.
And they had a ref that gave them a serious lions share of the 50/50s
But Spurs hadn;t threatened seriously for the second half. They weren't hammering at our door that hard.
And they had a ref that gave them a serious lions share of the 50/50s
AZ Gull
@SeagullsAcademy @seagullsacademy.bsky.social
This season referees are only meant to add on additional time for goals if the restart is delayed by more than 30 seconds (I think that is right, although I'm open to correction).
There were also only 4 substitution windows used in the second half. So probably about right.
Blackadder
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Some of the subs came on at the same time
Wardy's twin
Well-known member
- Oct 21, 2014
- 8,940
And blown straight on 4 mins if not before.
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Yep time for us to get a 4th….and Spurs fans weren’t fuming….most had left
Last edited:
Isn’t there a mindless rule that no matter how long a goal celebration, only 30 seconds are added?
Last edited:
Shaktarman
Well-known member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 457
Coote gave them everything first half. Seriously biased and shit top 6 ref. Shouldn’t be forgotten.
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,395
Yeah it may have changed, but Arsenal perfected the 2 minute goal celebration, delayed restart a couple of seasons ago.
It wasn't something I'd even thought about until I saw them do it at the Amex.
Horrible club.
A mex eyecan
Well-known member
- Nov 3, 2011
- 3,971
ssshhhhh
The commentator said 'probably around four minutes' quite some time before the fourth official notified them that it would be four minutes. So I guess it was about right.
Although he should really have added on a fifth minute for Igor's cramp after the 90th.
Although he should really have added on a fifth minute for Igor's cramp after the 90th.
This was discussed on the commentary. There were no delays due to physios and as has been pointed out the goal clock starts ticking after 30 seconds. We hardly celebrated the first goal, and the other were not ‘much more than 30 seconds. So it was just a bunch of stoppages for subs…..I think there were just 3 stoppages for this. The extra time seems correct.
From the start of this season you are allowed 30 seconds to celebrate then the clock starts ticking until restart.
AZ Gull
@SeagullsAcademy @seagullsacademy.bsky.social
No - from this season, referees will only add extra time BEYOND 30 seconds for a goal celebration - Premier League changes for 2024-25: How VAR, handball and offside will be different
So, if a team celebrates for 2 minutes, the referee should allow an extra 90 seconds.
Shaktarman
Well-known member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 457
Yes - so 4 mins seemed about right - I thought 3 or 4 myself.
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,395
Yeah true.
But then again, that prick ref, at the Forest game should have added 2 minutes on, but blew up bang on 6 minutes whilst we were attacking.
C' est la guerre
For me it was 3mins best scenario, 4mins par and 5mins, obvious Spurs bias. Really pleased that he only played about 30 seconds after the 4mins as I was expecting another couple of minutes because they are Spurs. Contrast with the last match in injury time when the ball was out of play for at least 40% of the time and the ref blew on the exact injury time allocation.