Really? That's even more extraordinary. It's a textbook red card. What are they thinking?And Nuno is also not banned despite his foul mouthed and aggressive rant - go figure??
Really? That's even more extraordinary. It's a textbook red card. What are they thinking?And Nuno is also not banned despite his foul mouthed and aggressive rant - go figure??
As per this Nottingham Post article, Forest requested an extension to respond to the charge against Nuno (the deadline was originally tomorrow but it has been extended until next Wednesday). It appears that is why Nuno will be on the touchline this weekend.Really? That's even more extraordinary. It's a textbook red card. What are they thinking?
So - the answer to the original question has been confirmed by FH as 'stepping on the pitch'.
The TV commentators (who have the audio feed with the VAR) stated Huerzeler was sent off for encroaching on the pitch.
...
I'm not being obnoxious, just asking what point you are making. What have I missed?UM......couldn't see ? Why be so obnoxious ?
And as mentioned on TS after the match as per my earlier post …..so that release from the PL was incorrect?As indicated by the TV commentary team at the time:
And as mentioned on TS after the match as per my earlier post …..so that release from the PL was incorrect?
Except technically he wasn't in the technical area!"..unacceptable technical area behaviour" is so broad and all-encompassing it could literally cover anything.
Like a mix of Orwell and Kafka. I like it."..unacceptable technical area behaviour" is so broad and all-encompassing it could literally cover anything.
For wearing a loud haircut in a built-up area?
So - the answer to the original question has been confirmed by FH as 'stepping on the pitch'.
Yup. Love it.Man loves his water bottle
If you are referring to the Premier League release I posted - stepping onto the pitch is included in ‘unacceptable behaviour in the technical area’ . However, as I said before, just encroaching on the pitch is usually a warning or caution for the first offence in the absence of aggressive behaviour to a match official so I would not surprised if the red was given to FH in confusion/haste/kneejerk once it had all kicked off with handbags at dawn - leaving the technical area and encroaching on the pitch or into another teams technical area to challenge the ref or any match official in a confrontational manner is what earns a red card usually. However, it seems FH’s disagreement was mild enough not to receive a match ban (in other words his behaviour was probably more deserving of a warning/at the most a caution imo but who’s going to admit to that in retrospect?.And as mentioned on TS after the match as per my earlier post …..so that release from the PL was incorrect?
Well the fact that he didn't get a match ban for his red card is basically admitting that it was too harsh.If you are referring to the Premier League release I posted - stepping onto the pitch is included in ‘unacceptable behaviour in the technical area’ . However, as I said before, just encroaching on the pitch is usually a warning or caution for the first offence in the absence of aggressive behaviour to a match official so I would not surprised if the red was given to FH in confusion/haste/kneejerk once it had all kicked off with handbags at dawn - leaving the technical area and encroaching on the pitch or into another teams technical area to challenge the ref or any match official in a confrontational manner is what earns a red card usually. However, it seems FH’s disagreement was mild enough not to receive a match ban (in other words his behaviour was probably more deserving of a warning/at the most a caution imo but who’s going to admit to that in retrospect?.
I disagree - but you are right in so far as we won’t get much more than that so its pointless asking..as I indicated above.Well the fact that he didn't get a match ban for his red card is basically admitting that it was too harsh.
They could easily have gone with the "pretend nothing went wrong"-way and banned him, but opted to sort out the poor/harsh decision. Can't ask for much more than that.
Hopefully not. Its something he should quit doing, at least until clubs start publicly apologising to refs for their diving and timewasting. Or until they make public apologies to their fans about mistakes by recruitment teams, staff or players. Its not fair or healthy the way it is now.I disagree - but you are right in so far as we won’t get much more than that so its pointless asking..as I indicated above.
So they are admitting it tacitly but that is not enough in the interest of integrity and transparency - a mistake is a mistake - if FH shouldn’t have deserved a red, then it should be withdrawn with an apology - maintaining a red card penalty without the penalty of a ban isn’t a red card - I mean wtf half-ar&ed outcome is that!? Howard Webb makes it a full time job apologising for referee errors - I’m sure he can fit another one into his busy schedule.
Hopefully not. Its something he should quit doing, at least until clubs start publicly apologising to refs for their diving and timewasting. Or until they make public apologies to their fans about mistakes by recruitment teams, staff or players. Its not fair or healthy the way it is now.
I once warned a fellow manager of the opposition to please keep to your technical area. No red cards were issued."..unacceptable technical area behaviour" is so broad and all-encompassing it could literally cover anything.