Blimey just had a look - 10 men after 5 mins and won 3-2 95th min winner after Lyon scored in 92nd... no wonder they were going beserk. They don't like each other much either I don't think (Lyon amd Marseille)?!
If you watch all their goals again Dunk is nowhere near where he’s meant to be. Simple push that back line back 10 yards and we probably win the game hardly rocket science.Under Hurzeler we are always going to be vulnerable to fast breaks. We simply don’t have the pace at the back to cover. We will learn and improve but expect us to concede these sort of goals because it’s the way we play. Hopefully not as often as the last two games.
Points dropped? Maybe but that is football.
Am I meant to be offended?Then go celebrate with your rapist apologising idol.
Dwayne got to choose it.How did Hinshelwood not get MOTM?
If you watch the second goal Veltman is 5 yards behind playing everyone on.If you watch all their goals again Dunk is nowhere near where he’s meant to be. Simple push that back line back 10 yards and we probably win the game hardly rocket science.
Tin pot League.No away fans allowed after last season fair to say they hate each other. Even Maupay looked competent and stuck to his job well.
Haven't read on through all of this thread but thought Rutter had a half decent game yesterday, some clever touches here and there and certainly puts in the effort- I have no doubt he'll come good. I think a few could do with tempering their expectations that every player we sign is going to be 10/10 every week and score 20 goals a seasonConcerned about Minteh and Ruttner being really crap but costing £70m
In fairness, a striker should always be shooting there. Just not straight at the keeper like Welbeck did. But that’s why he’s playing for us and not a top 4 side anymore, because he’s not a natural finisher.There’s a naivety and selfishness in front of goal we need to eradicate if we want to kick on. When Welbeck wriggled through a simple five yard pass to Mitoma gave him a tap into an empty net, like they did with their goal. It’s costing us. .
That's a fair point...After getting our noses in front in a scrappy game why are we still pushing that high line? accept it probably isn’t our day to smash in 4 and take the 3 points.
Two dropped
He looked better second half IMO but was pretty average in the first.Am I the only one who thought Rutter looked ok today?
That’s because Forest had (as you point out) two battalions across their 18 yard box - we, as also pointed out by numerous posters, afford teams loads of space - hence MGW operating a touch/bang tactic every time he had the ball. It’s easy to look quick ‘in transition’ (yuk) when there’s a PRAIRIE of openness in front of Bart. Hurzeler’s Brighton are still more dynamic and direct than GPott’s & RDZfaster maybe but compared to the breaks that Forest made we were slow , once the defence has 8-10 behind the ball its going to be very hard to score.
Not sure if we are better or worse under Hurzeler than RDZ, Wolves away at start of last season was pretty quick breaks. If you hit them quicker there wouldn't be two battalions across the 18 yard box, what's more is they are running back facing their goal rather than standing behind ball and facing up field. I get the playing at the back but once you have sucked everyone into your half the ball needs to go forward quickly and that can be through the midfield or maybe more quickly out to the wing.That’s because Forest had (as you point out) two battalions across their 18 yard box - we, as also pointed out by numerous posters, afford teams loads of space - hence MGW operating a touch/bang tactic every time he had the ball. It’s easy to look quick ‘in transition’ (yuk) when there’s a PRAIRIE of openness in front of Bart. Hurzeler’s Brighton are still more dynamic and direct than GPott’s & RDZ