That will be the scenario in Trump's vision of the future if he wins the electionThese days if you tell the truth, you get arrested and thrown on jail
That will be the scenario in Trump's vision of the future if he wins the electionThese days if you tell the truth, you get arrested and thrown on jail
These daysThese days if you tell the truth, you get arrested and thrown in jail
You know Zero hedge hosts articles from other publications right?Says the poster who used a link to zerohedge as their source of "evidence".
Absolute quality entertainment.
If you got past the paywall you can now show me up by copying it here and adding how you got past the wall.There's ways and means of getting past paywalls. By your comment you've obviously not managed to do so yourself and therefore you haven't read the article, so you are hardly in a position to say it's of questionable legitimacy. You've merely demonstrated that that is your stock response to anything which conflicts with your narrative so it's a pointless exercise providing you with proof of anything. I actually don't care that you're a Trump fan boy so I'm not going to waste my energy highlighting all his character flaws to you because you'll always be totally blind to them no matter what proof is presented to you because you'll just dismiss it as "questionable legitimacy".
So post it here so we can all see.The blind dismissal of the article by the various Trump fan boys is very odd as it doesn't actually say anything particularly negative about Trump. And if anything it says things that any Trump sycophant would surely want to hear.
The article merely relates how Trump fell out with Epstein when they were competing for the same piece of real estate. And it then goes on to state how Trump was the one who triumphed as he beat Epstein to the property, which in effect depicts Trump as a "winner" and an adept businessman, which is surely how his faithful devotees on NSC would want him to be depicted.
And yet here you are dismissing the article despite clearly not having read it, as you haven't figured how to bypass its pay wall, so are ignorant of it's content.
This merely exposes and defeats all your previous efforts to pour scorn on the legitimacy of the various articles presented to you which depict Trump in ways which conflict with your idealised and idolised image of him.
The only thing of questionable legitimacy now is your rejection of any evidence presented to you as you have now exposed the uninformed baselessness of your various rejections of anything negative of Trump.
I came across it a few years back when it constantly pushed pro-Putin propaganda. Maybe it has changed - but because of its pro-Kremlin past I always laugh now when someone uses one of their links.You know Zero hedge hosts articles from other publications right?
It's really not that difficult, you just provide an email address in the pop up and you can read it for free.If you got past the paywall you can now show me up by copying it here and adding how you got past the wall.
Trump now resorting to posting fake photos of Kamala Harris in the company of P Diddy, complete with false insinuating comments.
Given the existence of the unfaked photos of Trump in P Diddy's company he'd have to be a complete and utter imbecile to resort to such tactics.... Oh
Trump shares fake photo of Harris with Diddy in now-deleted Truth Social post
The former president has shared numerous fake images, including AI-generated ones, attacking Harris.www.nbcnews.com
Just google ‘paywall bypass’ and do it yourselfIf you got past the paywall you can now show me up by copying it here and adding how you got past the wall.
You don't continue to be a Trump supporter by reading things.The blind dismissal of the article by the various Trump fan boys is very odd as it doesn't actually say anything particularly negative about Trump. And if anything it says things that any Trump sycophant would surely want to hear.
The article merely relates how Trump fell out with Epstein when they were competing for the same piece of real estate. And it then goes on to state how Trump was the one who triumphed as he beat Epstein to the property, which in effect depicts Trump as a "winner" and an adept businessman, which is surely how his faithful devotees on NSC would want him to be depicted.
And yet here you are dismissing the article despite clearly not having read it, as you haven't figured how to bypass its pay wall, so are ignorant of it's content.
This merely exposes and defeats all your previous efforts to pour scorn on the legitimacy of the various articles presented to you which depict Trump in ways which conflict with your idealised and idolised image of him.
The only thing of questionable legitimacy now is your rejection of any evidence presented to you as you have now exposed the uninformed baselessness of your various rejections of anything negative of Trump.
I wouldn't call a free market doomer site pro putin, do you mean anti war?I came across it a few years back when it constantly pushed pro-Putin propaganda. Maybe it has changed - but because of its pro-Kremlin past I always laugh now when someone uses one of their links.
Carry on. With zerohedge links you are stealing the show here.
It's really not that difficult, you just provide an email address in the pop up and you can read it for free.
Go for it, I'm sure you'll find it very arousing. A word of caution, it's quite a lengthy article so try not to cum too early.
No, I mean pro-Putin. Zerohedge parroted the Kremlin's talking points all the time. Well known for it.I wouldn't call a free market doomer site pro putin, do you mean anti war?
No it isn't. It tends to be anti-war if anything and is no friend of Putin.No, I mean pro-Putin. Zerohedge parroted the Kremlin's talking points all the time. Well known for it.