Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Inheritance Tax



Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,251
Umm, yes, I did it for 20 years :shrug: The vast majority of people aren’t on self assessment. You think all those recipients of Aunt Maude’s cash would declare their inheritances ? To prevent that, you’d need a reporting process at point of distribution and then an audit process to ensure all the distributions had been captured - and HMRC are already drowning. It would be a colossal admin overhead.
Everyone aged 16 or over has an NI number.

If at the point of grant at probate it was reported electronically to HMRC the net estate together with NI number of beneficiaries and their share of estate then HMRC would know even before the assets had been conveyed as to who has got what.

HMRC could then target recipients of assets.

So many people inherit property that they either sell but don't report, or let out but don't tell HMRC about. Yes, HMRC have access to Land Registry records but are playing catch-up, particularly when people may have already spent the proceeds.

HMRC need to sort this problem out, because the cost of labour / systems are far outweighed by the lost tax revenue.
 




dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,615
Everyone aged 16 or over has an NI number.

If at the point of grant at probate it was reported electronically to HMRC the net estate together with NI number of beneficiaries and their share of estate then HMRC would know even before the assets had been conveyed as to who has got what.

HMRC could then target recipients of assets.

So many people inherit property that they either sell but don't report, or let out but don't tell HMRC about. Yes, HMRC have access to Land Registry records but are playing catch-up, particularly when people may have already spent the proceeds.

HMRC need to sort this problem out, because the cost of labour / systems are far outweighed by the lost tax revenue.
Very few people sell property and don't report the sale, because that would have be done for cash without involvement of a solicitor for either the buyer or the seller. Bearing in mind that the sale of a recently-inherited property will have few or no tax implications, why would they bother?

None of which is particularly relevant because they will never make estates taxable on the UK recipients. It would simple for a multi-millionaire to set up an overseas family trust and avoid the tax.
 


Birdie Boy

Well-known member
Jun 17, 2011
4,365
That‘s all we’ve done (and my parents did), as you say nothing to do with IHT or any other tax. From what I know IHT is actually pretty difficult to avoid for most - choices are spend it, give it away or take out an insurance policy to cover it.
Why did the life insurance need to go into a trust? If I did, the mortgage is paid off and the wife gets x amount. Would that not just be immediately paid out before probate?
 


Driver8

On the road...
NSC Patron
Jul 31, 2005
16,201
North Wales
Why did the life insurance need to go into a trust? If I did, the mortgage is paid off and the wife gets x amount. Would that not just be immediately paid out before probate?
No. If not in trust it is part of the estate and subject to probate. That is the trouble with not getting proper advice and taking out life assurance with someone who advertises on daytime TV.

Edit: I’m not suggesting you did but many do.
 
Last edited:






Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,166
Withdean area
I don’t think expert advice is required with the life assurance issues mentioned above.

Simply ask the life company for the form to put the life assurance policy in trust. Their forms are incredibly simple.

In practical terms, following death the payout is made fairly swiftly directly to the stated beneficiary. Tax-free and not part of the estate.
 


dejavuatbtn

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2010
7,565
Henfield
Just bung an additional and simple extra 1% on income tax and stop fiddling about with lots of other minor tax changes.
Align the tax free allowance with highest rate of pension, review thresholds, stick up higher rate tax to a level where top top earners pay significantly more to increase overall tax income.
 


Driver8

On the road...
NSC Patron
Jul 31, 2005
16,201
North Wales
I don’t think expert advice is required with the life assurance issues mentioned above.

Simply ask the life company for the form to put the life assurance policy in trust. Their forms are incredibly simple.

In practical terms, following death the payout is made fairly swiftly directly to the stated beneficiary. Tax-free and not part of the estate.
Ok if you know to ask for one, most won’t. Also not all providers will provide one, especially those marketing directly to over 50’s for instance, although they will provide an M&S voucher or a free pen.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,022
Goldstone
So many people inherit property that they either sell but don't report, or let out but don't tell HMRC about.

I've never gone through this - don't all assets inherited go through probate, and get taxed before reaching the beneficiary? If so, how does the property become the benefactor's property without being taxed first?
 




Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,166
Withdean area
Align the tax free allowance with highest rate of pension, review thresholds, stick up higher rate tax to a level where top top earners pay significantly more to increase overall tax income.

45% is the top rate of tax.

I haven’t heard mainstream politicians or others of note say increase it.

Keeping 55% of what you’ve earned feels fair.

The focus should be on closing the tax gap and the loopholes that stop people avoiding 40% and 45% tax.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,022
Goldstone
People gift homes or at joke values to relatives, years before that.

Yeah but that applies to all assets, not just homes. @Pavilionaire said about people inheriting a property and then not paying tax. I'm not sure how that can happen.
 


drew

Drew
NSC Patron
Oct 3, 2006
23,576
Burgess Hill
That‘s all we’ve done (and my parents did), as you say nothing to do with IHT or any other tax. From what I know IHT is actually pretty difficult to avoid for most - choices are spend it, give it away or take out an insurance policy to cover it.
Not sure you can say IHT is difficult to avoid for most bearing in mind most estates don't come anywhere near having to pay it! In 2020/21 it was about 4% if estates that were subject to IHT.
 










Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,166
Withdean area
Not sure you can say IHT is difficult to avoid for most bearing in mind most estates don't come anywhere near having to pay it! In 2020/21 it was about 4% if estates that were subject to IHT.

This. Those with deep pockets for professionals make the moves many years before death.
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,404
Burgess Hill
Not sure you can say IHT is difficult to avoid for most bearing in mind most estates don't come anywhere near having to pay it! In 2020/21 it was about 4% if estates that were subject to IHT.
For most where the estate is over the threshold obviously 🙄
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,022
Goldstone
It’s ‘sold’ to the relative long before being on the radar of solicitors at time of death.

So you're not talking about a transaction 7 years or more before death, you're talking specifically about underselling a property closer to the time of death?
 


Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,166
Withdean area
So you're not talking about a transaction 7 years or more before death, you're talking specifically about underselling a property closer to the time of death?

IHT avoidance obviously can start many years prior to death.

I would imagine that @Pavilionaire meant the wider timeframe. We’ll have to see.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here