bristo
Active member
Yea…good point. Nice reply.I have always assumed these mark/score/ratings are “out of 10“ i.e. a ten point scale. What do others think?
Yea…good point. Nice reply.I have always assumed these mark/score/ratings are “out of 10“ i.e. a ten point scale. What do others think?
Pretty much spot on. Only thing I’d change is 9 for Baleba.Bart 7 -- good distribution
Veltman 7 -- so solid this season, nicked the ball impressively several times
JPvH 7 -- kept things tight, good on the ball
Dunk 6 -- generally solid
Hinshelwood 6 -- intelligent positioning and use of the ball
Baleba 8.5 MotM -- outrageous talent
Ayari 7 -- kept things ticking, some good creativity
Minteh 5 -- pressing is something else, final ball poor
Rutter 6 -- inventive, finishing in line with the feedback from Leeds
Mitoma 5 -- some good stuff, but poor decision-making, especially the treble first half effort and, even more so, that tame shot at the keeper when Welbeck was in acres of space on the penalty spot
Welbeck 6 -- intelligent making of space, touches didn't quite work out, impressive work rate
Subs: think FH made all the right decisions on this one, but none of them did much -- all 5
Some stunning play in there today, but final ball, crossing, decision-making and finishing way below par.
However if you did a test with 10 questions you could get 0 out of ten couldn’t you.I have always assumed these mark/score/ratings are “out of 10“ i.e. a ten point scale. What do others think?
True. But this is different to scoring someone, or something, “out of ten”I have always assumed these mark/score/ratings are “out of 10“ i.e. a ten point scale. What do others think?
He is a right footed player who is playing on the left side , so whenever he gets the ball , rather than looking down the line , he his always going inside and across the pitch , and never overlaps with Mitoma , we are missing PervisSo is Hinshelwood our first choice left back? Last season I was under the impression he was a midfielder being played out of position at right back before his injury, but thought he was playing there out of necessity and that once Veltman/Lamptey were fit, he'd go back into midfield.
Seems we now have adequate others for the full back positions. Estupinian, Kadioglu, Veltman, Lamptey etc...but we are still starting Hinshelwood at LB. Is he that good that we need to shoehorn him in to the starting line up wherever we can, or is it just that he's now a full back plain and simple, and we are unlikely to see him in midfield any more?
Thoughts?
So we would have to score Kemmy A a one? I rest my case.True. But this is different to scoring someone, or something, “out of ten”
I didn't notice Rutter at all in the first half.8? Reasoning? Wouldn’t have been surprised if he got took off at half-time
Might explain Mitoma’s flat performance as well.Enciso: 5 - He just looked off the pace. Too many long flights this week!
Partially agree but he succeeded with 33/34 passes. Not that he tried many spectacular ones but its still good numbers. Only need to really f*** up once and the whole "total spectator" goes out the window.I agree that just as it’s hard to give any kind of mark to a player who comes on for 5 minutes at the end - it’s almost impossible to give a mark for Bart, total spectator