Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Bart Verbruggen SINGS a 5-year deal
- Thread starter Stumpy Tim
- Start date
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
I may be old fashioned here, every youngster in football has to wait for a first team chance and then grab that opportunity and perform.
Personally the last player I would want around my first team group is a stroppy youngster who thinks he deserves a chance. I would bin him straight back the the 21’s.
I hope Bart isn’t suffering from an acute bout of “WantsToGoToManUtditis”
nwgull
Well-known member
This.
Steele is shit end off. Let's give Rushworth a run-out
Bart's out until after the Man Utd home game apparently...
and so it begins
oldboyroy
Well-known member
Bart's out until after the Man Utd home game apparently...
F in hell, the injuries are starting already!
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
This to, Steele is alright at passing out shit at the saving part which is fairly important in that position.
Mancgull
Well-known member
My hunch too.
However, it would need to be a hell of an offer to let him go now.
So you think the club is faking Barts injury for six weeks so that United won't buy him? Or am I reading it wrong? Because that is a completely improbable scenario.
Alwaysblue
Member
- Jul 19, 2018
- 52
To be fair 'alright' is a bit of an understatement. He's up there with allison and Ederson passing wise
barbus_max bhafc
Active member
Thought Bart had a great game yesterday - looked composed and will hopefully be our number 1 for a few more years yet
Gabbiano
Well-known member
What is a Post-Shot Expected Goal as opposed to just your bog standard xG?
All these obscure x stats go straight over my head.
I guess you could say position/trajectory of the shot rather than the position of the player shooting. Generally its a way to measure goalie quality.
Logically, post-shot expected goals would mean whether you expect the ball to go in the net after you've already seen it not go in the net.
I assume it's not quite that blisteringly stupid.
It’s kind of the reverse of Xg……..so Bart was ‘expected’ to concede 2.4 goals from the shots he faced (Arsenal had an xg of 2.42).
I’d assumed it’s exactly what it says - the expected goals (immediately) after the ball leaves the attacking player’s foot.
For example, a ball coming across the six yard box to the feet of an unmarked Neal Maupay might have an xG of say 0.5.
If however he balloons the ball 20 yards over the bar, the chance of a goal has gone. The xG has immediately dropped to 0.0, and it stands to reason that you would not factor that chance into a measure of the goalkeeper’s performance.
Nobby Cybergoat
Well-known member
- Jul 19, 2021
- 8,617
Hang on though, what about shots off target? You can't attribute anything to the keeper if the strikers keep missing?