Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Napoli interested in Billy Gilmour **Sold 30/08/24**



heathgate

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 13, 2015
3,854
Definitely not as good as Alexis, and a different player to Gross.

It's a new manager and a slightly new style, so who knows how well he could do.

I'll trust the club to make the right decision.
I don't, as yet, see a massive difference in the style post RDZ... maybe a bit more speed through the midfield, but I can't see much else yet.
 




Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,436
Hove
If that was to be Billy’s last game in the stripes then it’s a real shame, he was magnificent today. I understand the selling of players when we get massive money, but seeing a player of his ability and age go for what appears to be a fairly small fee just seems odd.
I don’t think we always act in just our interests, I think sometimes we act in the players interests too.

Perhaps Billy wants a fresh challenge, wants to experience playing abroad, or be a first choice starter. When a player has been as professional as Billy has, taken his time out of the team in good grace, then a move and fee maybe reflective of all that.
 


DarrenFreemansPerm

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Sep 28, 2010
17,441
Shoreham
I don’t think we always act in just our interests, I think sometimes we act in the players interests too.

Perhaps Billy wants a fresh challenge, wants to experience playing abroad, or be a first choice starter. When a player has been as professional as Billy has, taken his time out of the team in good grace, then a move and fee maybe reflective of all that.
That’s a fair response, will be a shame if he does leave, but he’ll go with everyone’s best wishes.
 




Couldn't Be Hyypia

We've come a long long way together
NSC Patron
Nov 12, 2006
16,693
Near Dorchester, Dorset
I don’t think we always act in just our interests, I think sometimes we act in the players interests too.

Perhaps Billy wants a fresh challenge, wants to experience playing abroad, or be a first choice starter. When a player has been as professional as Billy has, taken his time out of the team in good grace, then a move and fee maybe reflective of all that.
We actually defend. Yes, we look exposed sometimes when we have a high line, but we're generally defending more tightly. We look more organised to me.
 




DarrenFreemansPerm

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Sep 28, 2010
17,441
Shoreham
I don't, as yet, see a massive difference in the style post RDZ... maybe a bit more speed through the midfield, but I can't see much else yet.
As yet Hurzeler is still largely using RDZ’s players, I think once he’s got the full backs and midfield that he wants we’ll see FH’s system become more prominent.
 


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,268
As yet Hurzeler is still largely using RDZ’s players, I think once he’s got the full backs and midfield that he wants we’ll see FH’s system become more prominent.
Here's what he said yesterday:

"My job is about building on the foundations of the last three years, because the success the club has had in that time is massive.

"That is why I didn't change a lot of things. I am just trying to integrate with my team and give the club the success they deserve."


 


Freddo

Well-known member
May 14, 2006
732
Clapham
I’ve not been a Gilmour fan and have no issue selling him but I enjoyed his performance today though I think some have got a bit carried away and I thought Milner was slightly better of the two. Thought he was more effective than at any time last season though.

Looking forward to seeing more of a combination of Baleba, Wieffer and O’Reilly in centre midfield which potentially looks much stronger.
You've been pretty vocal on here on how you don't rate Gilmour, but this is just silly.
 




Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,868
Almería
I don't, as yet, see a massive difference in the style post RDZ... maybe a bit more speed through the midfield, but I can't see much else yet.

There are differences. We still play out from the back, of course, but we're not baiting the press to the same extent. Steele seems to be willing to go long to the wings more often, akin to what we saw from Sanchez under Potter.

Whereas RDZ wanted speed in transition, FH wants faster build up in general.

The patterns of play are also quite different, as is the positional play and shape in and out of possession. Difficult to explain this; would need an analyst with some lines on chalkboards.

I think we'll see further differences too once the new players are bedded in and everyone's on the same page.
 


heathgate

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 13, 2015
3,854
There are differences. We still play out from the back, of course, but we're not baiting the press to the same extent. Steele seems to be willing to go long to the wings more often, akin to what we saw from Sanchez under Potter.

Whereas RDZ wanted speed in transition, FH wants faster build up in general.

The patterns of play are also quite different, as is the positional play and shape in and out of possession. Difficult to explain this; would need an analyst with some lines on chalkboards.

I think we'll see further differences too once the new players are bedded in and everyone's on the same page.
Yes, it's small differences, a decent change yesterday was after half time when FH got Hinshelwood to get a bit closer to Mitoma, that felt a lot more cohesive.... but the passing pace through midfield is very obvious, to me at least,..... and Pedro running with the ball in central areas.
 


Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
23,644
Brighton
There are differences. We still play out from the back, of course, but we're not baiting the press to the same extent. Steele seems to be willing to go long to the wings more often, akin to what we saw from Sanchez under Potter.

Whereas RDZ wanted speed in transition, FH wants faster build up in general.

The patterns of play are also quite different, as is the positional play and shape in and out of possession. Difficult to explain this; would need an analyst with some lines on chalkboards.

I think we'll see further differences too once the new players are bedded in and everyone's on the same page.
I genuinely believe that RDZ was more interested in imposing his style of play onto the team rather than winning matches when he took over. We did ok against Liverpool initially as he didn’t change much (and sulked about it) but the players looked very confused for a number of games afterwards.

IMG_5612.jpeg


We dropped 12 points in the Potter/De Zerbi transition period. Did that cost us a top four place in 22/23?

Hürzeler is about the points and winning as a priority. I genuinely believe he wants to play great football in his own style too but that’s only going to come when he thinks the team is ready. Very impressive.

With the signings we are making, I still believe he is aiming to play his St Pauli system and formation.
However, I think this sort of line-up (two attacking midfielders ahead of a CDM/CD) might be a few weeks or even months away. He won’t play it until it’s working properly and it’s winning!

———————-—Verbruggen———————
——-Van Hecke——Wieffer—-Dunk————-
Kadıoğlu——O’Riley—-Rutter—-—-Estupiñán
——March————--Pedro———-Mitoma—-

7 different players and a new formation!

What I’m certain of is other EPL sides are not going to be working FH out for the time being. Because every match will be a step further in the evolution.
 












Sarisbury Seagull

Solly March Fan Club
NSC Patron
Nov 22, 2007
14,992
Sarisbury Green, Southampton
You've been pretty vocal on here on how you don't rate Gilmour, but this is just silly.
Is it? In what way? Tell me what Gilmour did that was so much better than Milner? I would recommend watching the game again and looking at the stats cos I think you’ll find that as tends to happen on here because he looks busy, Gilmour’s performance and influence has been over hyped.

I know some are not interested in stats but as a point of interest, Who Scored had them level rated, Sofa Score had Milner ahead of Gilmour.
 


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,868
Almería
I genuinely believe that RDZ was more interested in imposing his style of play onto the team rather than winning matches when he took over. We did ok against Liverpool initially as he didn’t change much (and sulked about it) but the players looked very confused for a number of games afterwards.

View attachment 187795

We dropped 12 points in the Potter/De Zerbi transition period. Did that cost us a top four place in 22/23?

Hürzeler is about the points and winning as a priority. I genuinely believe he wants to play great football in his own style too but that’s only going to come when he thinks the team is ready. Very impressive.

With the signings we are making, I still believe he is aiming to play his St Pauli system and formation.
However, I think this sort of line-up (two attacking midfielders ahead of a CDM/CD) might be a few weeks or even months away. He won’t play it until it’s working properly and it’s winning!

———————-—Verbruggen———————
——-Van Hecke——Wieffer—-Dunk————-
Kadıoğlu——O’Riley—-Rutter—-—-Estupiñán
——March————--Pedro———-Mitoma—-

7 different players and a new formation!

What I’m certain of is other EPL sides are not going to be working FH out for the time being. Because every match will be a step further in the evolution.

To be fair to RDZ he didn't get a preseason to work on anything so he had to impose his style on the fly. Would we have amassed 62 points. If he'd maintained Potter's tactics and slowly transitioned? Impossible to say but probably not.

In the end we were 9 points off top 4. Looking at De Zerbi's first 5 matches, picking up those additional points would have been incredible.

As for Hürzeler, I agree. He may well want to make wholesale changes, which means it's smart to take his time. Especially, as we haven't assembled the squad yet.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,020
Goldstone
I don't, as yet, see a massive difference in the style post RDZ... maybe a bit more speed through the midfield, but I can't see much else yet.

IMO, we're not sitting with the ball as much, in the hope of making the opposition over-commit. When we have the ball, we attack with more urgency. I'm not saying we never attacked quickly with RDZ, but there were some lovely goals where we scored after like 30 passes, but I don't see that happening here. And without the ball, either a quick press to win it back or everyone behind the ball with the strikers defending.
 
Last edited:


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,868
Almería
Is it? In what way? Tell me what Gilmour did that was so much better than Milner? I would recommend watching the game again and looking at the stats cos I think you’ll find that as tends to happen on here because he looks busy, Gilmour’s performance and influence has been over hyped.

I know some are not interested in stats but as a point of interest, Who Scored had them level rated, Sofa Score had Milner ahead of Gilmour.

I agree that Milner played well too but:


20240825_093109.jpg




 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,020
Goldstone
I don’t think we always act in just our interests, I think sometimes we act in the players interests too.

Perhaps Billy wants a fresh challenge, wants to experience playing abroad, or be a first choice starter. When a player has been as professional as Billy has, taken his time out of the team in good grace, then a move and fee maybe reflective of all that.

If that's the case, and Billy wants away, he really fcuked up yesterday
 


severnside gull

Well-known member
May 16, 2007
24,823
By the seaside in West Somerset
Felt it was his best game for us.
Was it his farewell performance? No idea but he has (reportedly) said he fancies Naples so we will see.
I honestly can’t see him being more than a rotational player given the talent we are bringing in
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here