So when we win its money - they win its fans?Yup, you managed to be proactive and it was - as I've said - delightful even on the TV screen. But normally you guys describe your fan culture as "reactive", so clearly that was an exception from the normal?
That they're no better or worse: it isn't my real view, it is the real view though.
As for the European teams visiting, at least Ajax and AEK (dunno exact about Marseille) doesn't even pay a third of the wages Brighton does, yet the AEK fans helped their team to a win against a billionaire bankrolled Premier League club. That's the power of fans.
Who was responsible for us repeatedly beating the top 4 that season?
My point was the snippy tone about the Chelsea game because it happened to be Potter. Whatever your fan culture no one really likes it being derided.
Reactive or otherwise fan involvement 'is what it is'. The idea that tifo culture drives teams on and other fan responses doesn't just doesn't make sense. Otherwise every Greek team would never lose and Arsenal would never win. And the whole point of pointing out the European games we saw last season was not to make comparisons about them or Brighton, but thatthat we got to see what we secretly already knew. Thay teams, espite noisy fans, can be directly completely un-influenced by that noise when it just becomes normal. It genuinely does just become monotonous. Like a car alarm going off. Loud, but not longer serving its function. It tends to feel more impressive when the team turn up (like Roma!l
I also like the idea that we were overlords against the European minnows of Ajax and Marseilles.