What wingers would you take to the Euro Cup

[deletebeepbeepbeep]

Lennon and Walcott are the same player, promise and shite final ball.

They are just blokes that can run fast that have been told to kick a ball in front of them whilst doing it.

Chamberlain looks promising though, although I'd be worried about burning him out.

Oh, if only Bale was English

 

[Ninja Elephant]

Lennon and Walcott are the same player, promise and shite final ball.

Walcott is much better than Lennon. But it's not saying too much.

 

[brightn'ove]

kevtherev, Mutts Nuts and pork pie.


oh sorry i thought you said whingers

 

[NickBHAFC18]

Walcott is much better than Lennon. But it's not saying too much.

Really? No way. Walcott is utter shit, Lennon on the other hand is shit, although he has been playing better for Tottenham recently.

I think Lennon has way more end product than Walcott, more dangerous on the ball also.

 

[Ninja Elephant]

Really? No way. Walcott is utter shit, Lennon on the other hand is shit, although he has been playing better for Tottenham recently.

I think Lennon has way more end product than Walcott, more dangerous on the ball also.

How many assists do you think Walcott has provided for Van Persie this season? And I'm fairly sure Walcott has popped up with double figures for goals too, he contributes an awful lot more than Lennon. I'm not saying Walcott is a world class right winger, far from it, but he's the better option of the two. Unless you like the sort of player who should be better technically, but doesn't actually contribute anything other than looking like a good player.

 

[NickBHAFC18]

How many assists do you think Walcott has provided for Van Persie this season? And I'm fairly sure Walcott has popped up with double figures for goals too, he contributes an awful lot more than Lennon. I'm not saying Walcott is a world class right winger, far from it, but he's the better option of the two. Unless you like the sort of player who should be better technically, but doesn't actually contribute anything other than looking like a good player.

That is a fair point. I've just never been a Walcott fan, probably the most frustrating player to watch in the Premiership. Either way, Johnson would be my choice over those 2.

 

[Ninja Elephant]

That is a fair point. I've just never been a Walcott fan, probably the most frustrating player to watch in the Premiership. Either way, Johnson would be my choice over those 2.

To be honest, I'm not a fan of either of them. I prefer the more technical players to the speed merchants, it's very rare you have a lightning quick winger who actually has technical ability. I would still be playing Beckham to be honest. Kyle Walker bombing up the wing behind him would give Becks the space and time to whip crosses on to the head of Andy Carroll. If only.

 

[NickBHAFC18]

To be honest, I'm not a fan of either of them. I prefer the more technical players to the speed merchants, it's very rare you have a lightning quick winger who actually has technical ability. I would still be playing Beckham to be honest. Kyle Walker bombing up the wing behind him would give Becks the space and time to whip crosses on to the head of Andy Carroll. If only.

This. Always said Beckham deserves a place in the England team. His ball distribution is unbelievable and when he is on the pitch, England play better.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Walcott is much better than Lennon. But it's not saying too much.

No he isnt, they really are trash and over rated

 

[Ninja Elephant]

This. Always said Beckham deserves a place in the England team. His ball distribution is unbelievable and when he is on the pitch, England play better.

I don't like it when people agree with me, so I'm going to spice it up a bit now.

Joe Hart should be dropped in favour of Scott Carson.

 

[NickBHAFC18]

I don't like it when people agree with me, so I'm going to spice it up a bit now.

Joe Hart should be dropped in favour of Scott Carson.

I completely disagree with you

 

[Tricky Dicky]

Walcott is much better than Lennon. But it's not saying too much.

Walcott has learnt nothing in 6 years. He has pace but little else. Just look at how Oxo-Chambermaid had progressed in his short time something Walcott has not done at all.

 

[withdeanwombat]

Wally Gould.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

To be honest, I'm not a fan of either of them. I prefer the more technical players to the speed merchants, it's very rare you have a lightning quick winger who actually has technical ability. I would still be playing Beckham to be honest. Kyle Walker bombing up the wing behind him would give Becks the space and time to whip crosses on to the head of Andy Carroll. If only.

This. Always said Beckham deserves a place in the England team. His ball distribution is unbelievable and when he is on the pitch, England play better.

I don't like it when people agree with me.

Don't panic - NOBODY is going to agree with the Andy Carroll part.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Adam Johnson needs to leave city and get more games

 

[Foolg]

Matt Jarvis is a far far better player than AOC. Surely anyone that watches Arsenal knows just how over rated he is, he's yet to do anything at Arsenal, simply filling the gaps due to a lack of wingers. Amount of times he's lost the ball and almost cost Arsenal on the counter attack!

 

[grawhite]

Lennon (slightly better delivery than Walcott in recent months). AOC, Joe Cole, Ashley Young.

 

[NickBHAFC18]

Matt Jarvis is a far far better player than AOC. Surely anyone that watches Arsenal knows just how over rated he is, he's yet to do anything at Arsenal, simply filling the gaps due to a lack of wingers. Amount of times he's lost the ball and almost cost Arsenal on the counter attack!

Jarvis has been below par for most the season for Wolves, especially compared to his performances last season. He certainly isn't Euro's standard. Plus AOC is what 18? (correct me if i am wrong) and his first season in the Premiership, give him a few more seasons he'll be quality.

 

[Foolg]

Jarvis has been below par for most the season for Wolves, especially compared to his performances last season. He certainly isn't Euro's standard. Plus AOC is what 18? (correct me if i am wrong) and his first season in the Premiership, give him a few more seasons he'll be quality.

In a few more seasons, yes, but this is a major tournament and we want to do well. Save players like that for friendlies, that's what they're for. He's made 6 yes SIX Premier League starts for christs sake. Jarvis has scored 7 goals in the league for the worst team in the league, and has taken some of the better full backs apart at times. Oxlade-Chamberlain loses the ball FAR too often to be a success at the Euros.
To throw someone into competitive international football after 6 starts is ludacrous. Added to the fact he's not good enough.

 

[Ninja Elephant]

I completely disagree with you

Sanity restored.

Don't panic - NOBODY is going to agree with the Andy Carroll part.

I would take him and play him. It's a bit shout, I know, but what options do we have? Danny Welbeck? Behave. It will either be Carroll, or Hodgson will be brave and take Grant Holt. I, personally, would prefer Holt, but I suspect Carroll will get the nod.